The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanistic Insights into the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Cu2O-Derived Copper Catalysts
Abstract
In this work, we made a comprehensive investigation to unravel the underlying causes for the selectivity of CO 2 electroreduction toward ethylene on Cu 2 O-derived Cu catalysts. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, online gas chromatography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and numerical simulations of local pH were used toward this end. Ten Cu 2 O-derived Cu films of different thicknesses and morphologies were prepared and extensively characterized. Aqueous 0.1 M KHCO 3 was used as the electrolyte. We report here, for the first time, a remarkably strong correlation between the statistically relevant crystallite sizes of the Cu 2 O-derived Cu particles and selective CO 2 electroreduction to C 2 H 4 . Specifically, as the crystallite size of the particles decreased from 41 to 18 nm, the Faradaic efficiency (FE) of C 2 H 4 formation increased from 10 to 43%. Using cyclic voltammetry, samples with smaller particle crystallite sizes were found to possess more diverse adsorption sites for CO (a known reaction intermediate), which we interpret to be important for the C–C coupling of C 1 adsorbates to C 2 intermediates. The effect of local pH on the yield of C 2 H 4 for the different Cu 2 O-derived Cu catalysts was less significant when compared to the effects of crystallite sizes and mass transport limitations. We also show here that remarkable amounts of C 2 and C 3 products could be achieved using these Cu 2 O-derived Cu catalysts. Driven at a fixed total current density of −31.2 mA cm –2, the catalysts could reduce CO 2 to C 2 H 4, ethanol, and n-propanol with optimized FEs of 42.6% ( j C2H4 = −13.3 mA cm –2 ), 11.8% ( j C2H5OH = −3.7 mA cm –2 ), and 5.4% ( j C3H7OH = −1.7 mA cm –2 ), respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
Li, C. W., & Kanan, M. W. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3010978 · Cited by 2,000
Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper
Li, C. W., Ciston, J., & Kanan, M. W. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13249 · Cited by 1,728
Electrocatalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methane and Methanol on Transition Metal Surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Hatsukade, T., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., Kibsgaard, J., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja505791r · Cited by 1,649
Ren, D., Deng, Y., Handoko, A. D., Chen, C. S., Malkhandi, S., & Yeo, B. S. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs502128q · Cited by 930
Self-citationProbing the Active Surface Sites for CO Reduction on Oxide-Derived Copper Electrocatalysts
Verdaguer-Casadevall, A., Li, C. W., Johansson, T. P., Scott, S. B., McKeown, J. T., Kumar, M., Stephens, I. E. L., Kanan, M. W., & Chorkendorff, I. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b06227 · Cited by 645
Competition between CO 2 Reduction and H 2 Evolution on Transition-Metal Electrocatalysts
Zhang, Y.-J., Sethuraman, V., Michalsky, R., & Peterson, A. A. (2014) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs5012298 · Cited by 509
Cited by
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
De Luna, P., Quintero-Bermudez, R., Dinh, C.-T., Ross, M. B., Bushuyev, O. S., Todorović, P., Regier, T., Kelley, S. O., Yang, P., & Sargent, E. H. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-017-0018-9 · Cited by 1,046
Arán-Ais, R. M., Scholten, F., Kunze, S., Rizo, R., & Roldan Cuenya, B. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0594-9 · Cited by 771
Ren, D., Ang, B. S.-H., & Yeo, B. S. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02162 · Cited by 721
Self-citationGarg, S., Li, M., Weber, A. Z., Ge, L., Li, L., Rudolph, V., Wang, G., & Rufford, T. E. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c9ta13298h · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Handoko, A. D., Ong, C. W., Huang, Y., Lee, Z. G., Lin, L., Panetti, G. B., & Yeo, B. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 20058-20067
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2511654019
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanistic Insights into the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Cu2O-Derived Copper Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07128
- The paper
- Handoko, A. D., Ong, C. W., Huang, Y., Lee, Z. G., Lin, L., Panetti, G. B., & Yeo, B. S. (2016). Mechanistic Insights into the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Cu2O-Derived Copper Catalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.