Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanistic Insights into the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Cu2O-Derived Copper Catalysts

Handoko, Albertus D., Ong, Cheng Wai, Huang, Yun, Lee, Zheng Guang, Lin, Liyi, Panetti, Grace B., Yeo, Boon Siang·2016·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

In this work, we made a comprehensive investigation to unravel the underlying causes for the selectivity of CO 2 electroreduction toward ethylene on Cu 2 O-derived Cu catalysts. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, online gas chromatography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and numerical simulations of local pH were used toward this end. Ten Cu 2 O-derived Cu films of different thicknesses and morphologies were prepared and extensively characterized. Aqueous 0.1 M KHCO 3 was used as the electrolyte. We report here, for the first time, a remarkably strong correlation between the statistically relevant crystallite sizes of the Cu 2 O-derived Cu particles and selective CO 2 electroreduction to C 2 H 4 . Specifically, as the crystallite size of the particles decreased from 41 to 18 nm, the Faradaic efficiency (FE) of C 2 H 4 formation increased from 10 to 43%. Using cyclic voltammetry, samples with smaller particle crystallite sizes were found to possess more diverse adsorption sites for CO (a known reaction intermediate), which we interpret to be important for the C–C coupling of C 1 adsorbates to C 2 intermediates. The effect of local pH on the yield of C 2 H 4 for the different Cu 2 O-derived Cu catalysts was less significant when compared to the effects of crystallite sizes and mass transport limitations. We also show here that remarkable amounts of C 2 and C 3 products could be achieved using these Cu 2 O-derived Cu catalysts. Driven at a fixed total current density of −31.2 mA cm –2, the catalysts could reduce CO 2 to C 2 H 4, ethanol, and n-propanol with optimized FEs of 42.6% ( j C2H4 = −13.3 mA cm –2 ), 11.8% ( j C2H5OH = −3.7 mA cm –2 ), and 5.4% ( j C3H7OH = −1.7 mA cm –2 ), respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07128

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Handoko, A. D., Ong, C. W., Huang, Y., Lee, Z. G., Lin, L., Panetti, G. B., & Yeo, B. S.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2016-09-01
Volume
120
Issue
36
Pages
20058-20067
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2511654019
Cited by
209
References
8
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanistic Insights into the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Cu2O-Derived Copper Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07128
The paper
Handoko, A. D., Ong, C. W., Huang, Y., Lee, Z. G., Lin, L., Panetti, G. B., & Yeo, B. S. (2016). Mechanistic Insights into the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Cu2O-Derived Copper Catalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.