The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Volume Changes of Graphite Anodes Revisited: A Combined Operando X-ray Diffraction and In Situ Pressure Analysis Study
Abstract
Lithium intercalation into graphite is one of the electrochemically best studied solid-state reactions, and its application in lithium-ion batteries was a pioneering step in the development of advanced electrochemical storage devices. Therefore, one might expect that virtually any aspect of this important reaction has been examined both qualitatively and quantitatively. All the more, it is surprising that there are only a few experimental studies on the volume expansion of graphite, especially under cycling conditions. To the best of our knowledge, there exists no comprehensive set of structural data as a function of lithium content. Here, we present this missing information using combined results from electrochemical testing and operando X-ray diffraction. The changes in lattice parameters and unit cell volume are examined and related to the different intercalation stages and phase transition regimes. A total volume expansion (from space-group-independent evaluation) of 13.2% is observed when C 6 is fully lithiated to a composition of LiC 6, of which approximately 5.9% occur in the early dilute stages. The remaining expansion of approximately 7.3% is due to transition from stage 2 to stage 1. These findings are corroborated by in situ pressure measurements on prelithiated Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 /graphite cells. Collectively, our data provide valuable information about one of the most important electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries and clearly demonstrate that even partially lithiated graphite experiences considerable crystallographic strain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Graphite as anode materials: Fundamental mechanism, recent progress and advances
Zhang, H., Yang, Y., Ren, D., Wang, L., & He, X. (2021) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.027 · Cited by 1,011
Koerver, R., Zhang, W., de Biasi, L., Schweidler, S., Kondrakov, A. O., Kolling, S., Brezesinski, T., Hartmann, P., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee00907d · Cited by 872
Self-citationJiang, M., Danilov, D. L., Eichel, R., & Notten, P. H. L. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202103005 · Cited by 720
Yang, Y., Song, S., Lei, S., Sun, W., Hou, H., Jiang, F., Ji, X., Zhao, W., & Hu, Y. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.008 · Cited by 309
Bilfinger, P., Rosner, P., Schreiber, M., Kröger, T., Gamra, K. A., Ank, M., Wassiliadis, N., Dietermann, B., & Lienkamp, M. (2024) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2024.100356 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Schweidler, S., de Biasi, L., Schiele, A., Hartmann, P., Brezesinski, T., & Janek, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-04-04
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 8829-8835
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2799694704
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volume Changes of Graphite Anodes Revisited: A Combined Operando X-ray Diffraction and In Situ Pressure Analysis Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01873
- The paper
- Schweidler, S., de Biasi, L., Schiele, A., Hartmann, P., Brezesinski, T., & Janek, J. (2018). Volume Changes of Graphite Anodes Revisited: A Combined Operando X-ray Diffraction and In Situ Pressure Analysis Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.