The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A process for combination of recycling lithium and regenerating graphite from spent lithium-ion battery
Abstract
Recycling lithium and graphite from spent lithium-ion battery plays a significant role in mitigation of lithium resources shortage, comprehensive utilization of spent anode graphite and environmental protection. In this study, spent graphite was firstly collected by a two-stage calcination. Secondly, under the optimal conditions of 1.5 M HCI, 60 min and solid-liquid ratio (S/L) of 100 g·L-1, the collected graphite suffers simple acid leaching to make almost 100% lithium, copper and aluminum in it into leach liquor. Thirdly, 99.9% aluminum and 99.9% copper were removed from leach liquor by adjusting pH first to 7 and then to 9, and thenthe lithium was recovered by adding sodium carbonate in leach liquor to form lithium carbonate with high purity (>99%). The regenerated graphite is found to have high initial specific capacity at the rate of 37.2 mA·g-1 (591 mAh·g-1), 74.4 mA·g-1 (510 mAh·g-1) and 186 mA·g-1 (335 mAh·g-1), and with the high retention ratio of 97.9% after 100 cycles, it also displays excellent cycle performance at high rate of 372 mA·g-1. By this process, copper and lithium can be recovered and graphite can be regenerated, serving as a sustainable approach for the comprehensive utilization of anode material from spent lithium-ion battery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insertion Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Winter, M., Besenhard, J. O., Spahr, M. E., & Novák, P. (1998) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::aid-adma725>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 2,965
Expanded graphite as superior anode for sodium-ion batteries
Wen, Y., He, K., Zhu, Y., Han, F., Xu, Y., Matsuda, I., Ishii, Y., Cumings, J., & Wang, C. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5033 · Cited by 1,894
Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts
Duan, J., & Gregory, J. (2003) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/s0001-8686(02)00067-2 · Cited by 1,716
A Critical Review and Analysis on the Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lv, W., Wang, Z., Cao, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2018) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03811 · Cited by 1,163
Schweidler, S., de Biasi, L., Schiele, A., Hartmann, P., Brezesinski, T., & Janek, J. (2018) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01873 · Cited by 511
Lithium Carbonate Recovery from Cathode Scrap of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery: A Closed-Loop Process
Gao, W., Zhang, X., Zheng, X., Lin, X., Cao, H., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b03320 · Cited by 507
In situ analytical techniques for battery interface analysis
Tripathi, A. M., Su, W.-N., & Hwang, B. J. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00180k · Cited by 488
Li, L., Fan, E., Guan, Y., Zhang, X., Xue, Q., Wei, L., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2017) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00571 · Cited by 471
A novel method to recycle mixed cathode materials for lithium ion batteries
Zou, H., Gratz, E., Apelian, D., & Wang, Y. (2013) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c3gc40182k · Cited by 432
Xiao, J., Li, J., & Xu, Z. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02561 · Cited by 418
Cited by
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Nižetić, S., Djilali, N., Papadopoulos, A., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.397 · Cited by 538
Technologies of lithium recycling from waste lithium ion batteries: a review
Bae, H., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d1ma00216c · Cited by 428
Recent progress on the recycling technology of Li-ion batteries
Wang, Y., An, N., Wen, L., Wang, L., Jiang, X., Hou, F., Yin, Y., & Liang, J. (2021) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2020.05.008 · Cited by 404
A review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by the bioleaching approach
Roy, J. J., Cao, B., & Madhavi, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130944 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., Song, S., Lei, S., Sun, W., Hou, H., Jiang, F., Ji, X., Zhao, W., & Hu, Y.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 529-537
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913698145
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A process for combination of recycling lithium and regenerating graphite from spent lithium-ion battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.008
- The paper
- Yang, Y., Song, S., Lei, S., Sun, W., Hou, H., Jiang, F., Ji, X., Zhao, W., & Hu, Y. (2019). A process for combination of recycling lithium and regenerating graphite from spent lithium-ion battery. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
