The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine-Learning-Augmented Chemisorption Model for CO2 Electroreduction Catalyst Screening
Abstract
We present a machine-learning-augmented chemisorption model that enables fast and accurate prediction of the surface reactivity of metal alloys within a broad chemical space. Specifically, we show that artificial neural networks, a family of biologically inspired learning algorithms, trained with a set of ab initio adsorption energies and electronic fingerprints of idealized bimetallic surfaces, can capture complex, nonlinear interactions of adsorbates (e.g., *CO) on multimetallics with ∼0.1 eV error, outperforming the two-level interaction model in prediction. By leveraging scaling relations between adsorption energies of similar adsorbates, we illustrate that this integrated approach greatly facilitates high-throughput catalyst screening and, as a specific case, suggests promising {100}-terminated multimetallic alloys with improved efficiency and selectivity for CO2 electrochemical reduction to C2 species. Statistical analysis of the network response to perturbations of input features underpins our fundamental understanding of chemical bonding on metal surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials
Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonini, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G. L., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 · Cited by 29,281
Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode
Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp047349j · Cited by 13,153
Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces
Behler, J., & Parrinello, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401 · Cited by 5,010
Why gold is the noblest of all the metals
Hammer, B., & Norskov, J. K. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376238a0 · Cited by 3,935
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces
Hammer, B., & Nørskov, J. K. (1995) · Surface Science · doi:10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 · Cited by 2,871
Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis
Nørskov, J. K., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., & Bligaard, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1006652108 · Cited by 2,611
Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.058301 · Cited by 2,312
Recent advancements in Pt and Pt-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction
Nie, Y., Li, L., & Wei, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00484a · Cited by 2,156
Cited by
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science
Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 · Cited by 2,607
Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling
Ross, M. B., De Luna, P., Li, Y., Dinh, C.-T., Kim, D., Yang, P., & Sargent, E. H. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0306-7 · Cited by 1,302
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization
Zhang, Z., Pan, S.-Y., Li, H., Cai, J., Olabi, A. G., Anthony, E. J., & Manovic, V. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109799 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, X., Li, Z., Achenie, L. E. K., & Xin, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-08-27
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3528-3533
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2462003543
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine-Learning-Augmented Chemisorption Model for CO2 Electroreduction Catalyst Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01660
- The paper
- Ma, X., Li, Z., Achenie, L. E. K., & Xin, H. (2015). Machine-Learning-Augmented Chemisorption Model for CO2 Electroreduction Catalyst Screening. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
