Cited by 45Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Degradation and InhibitorsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Disease Association and Druggability of WD40 Repeat Proteins

Song, Richard, Wang, Zhong-Duo, Schapira, Matthieu·2017·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

WD40 repeat (WDR) domains are protein interaction scaffolds that represent one of the largest protein families in human, and a first WDR inhibitor-an allosteric antagonist of polycomb repressive complex 2-just entered the clinic. A systematic analysis of the CORUM database of protein complexes shows that WDR is the most represented domain in transcriptional regulation and one of the most prevalent in the ubiquitin proteasome system, two pathways of high relevance to drug discovery. Parsing the literature and the vulnerability of cancer cell lines to CRISPR knockout indicates that WDR proteins are targets of interest in oncology and other disease areas. A quantitative analysis of WDR structures reveals that druggable binding pockets can be found on multiple surfaces of these multifaceted protein interaction platforms. These data support the development of chemical probes to further interrogate WDR proteins as an emerging therapeutic target class.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00451

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The central cavity of WDR domains can sometimes be positively or negatively charged, which reduces its ligandability.

    “but this site can sometimes be positively or negatively charged, which reduces its ligandability 72 .”

    From Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox (2019) · cites this paper as [72]

  • The central cavity of WDR domains is generally deep and enclosed.

    “The central cavity of WDR domains is generally deep and enclosed, two important properties for potent binding of chemical handles”

    From Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox (2019) · cites this paper as [72]

  • The central cavity of RBBP4 is highly basic compared to those of WDR5, EED, DCAF1, PAFAH1B1, ATG16L1 or ERCC8.

    “the central cavity of DDB2 and RBBP4 are highly acidic and basic, respectively, compared to those of WDR5, EED, DCAF1, PAFAH1B1, ATG16L1 or ERCC8.”

    From Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox (2019) · cites this paper as [72]

  • The central cavity of DDB2 is highly acidic compared to those of WDR5, EED, DCAF1, PAFAH1B1, ATG16L1 or ERCC8.

    “the central cavity of DDB2 and RBBP4 are highly acidic and basic, respectively, compared to those of WDR5, EED, DCAF1, PAFAH1B1, ATG16L1 or ERCC8.”

    From Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox (2019) · cites this paper as [72]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, R., Wang, Z.-D., & Schapira, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada
Corresponding author
Schapira, Matthieu
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2017-09-28
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
3766-3773
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W2758088381
Cited by
45
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
WD40 repeat proteins, druggability, binding pocket, polycomb repressive complex 2, allosteric inhibitors, protein complexes, ubiquitin-proteasome system, transcriptional regulation, cancer cell lines, chemical probes, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
WD40 Repeats, Protein Domains, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Neoplasms, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Ubiquitin, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Gene Knockout Techniques, Drug Discovery, Polycomb Repressive Complex 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review