Cited by 46Zeolite Catalysis and SynthesisMembrane Separation and Gas TransportCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Monte Carlo Simulations Probing the Adsorptive Separation of Hydrogen Sulfide/Methane Mixtures Using All-Silica Zeolites

Open access
Shah, Mansi S., Tsapatsis, Michael, Siepmann, J. Ilja·2015·Langmuir

Abstract

Selective removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from sour natural gas mixtures is one of the key challenges facing the natural gas industry. Adsorption and pervaporation processes utilizing nanoporous materials, such as zeolites, can be alternatives to highly energy-intensive amine-based absorption processes. In this work, the adsorption behavior of binary mixtures containing H2S and methane (CH4) in seven different all-silica zeolite frameworks (CHA, DDR, FER, IFR, MFI, MOR, and MWW) is investigated using Gibbs ensemble Monte Carlo simulations at two temperatures (298 and 343 K) and pressures ranging from 1 to 50 bar. The simulations demonstrate high selectivities that, with the exception of MOR, increase with increasing H2S concentration due to favorable sorbate-sorbate interactions. The simulations indicate significant inaccuracies of predictions using unary adsorption data and ideal adsorbed solution theory. In addition, the adsorption of binary H2S/H2O mixtures in MFI is considered to probe whether the presence of H2S induces coadsorption and reduces the hydrophobic character of all-silica zeolites. The simulations show preferential adsorption of H2S from moist gases with a selectivity of about 18 over H2O.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03015

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, M. S., Tsapatsis, M., & Siepmann, J. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0132, United States
Corresponding author
Siepmann, J. Ilja
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2015-10-27
Volume
31
Issue
44
Pages
12268-12278
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2197027196
Cited by
46
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Langmuir (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Basic Energy Sciences (DE-FG02-12ER16362)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
hydrogen sulfide removal, all-silica zeolites, adsorption selectivity, natural gas desulfurization, binary gas mixtures, zeolite hydrophobicity, ideal adsorbed solution theory, MFI zeolite, MWW zeolite, MOR zeolite, FER zeolite, DDR zeolite, CHA zeolite, Gibbs ensemble Monte Carlo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review