The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lipid Exchange Envelope Penetration (LEEP) of Nanoparticles for Plant Engineering: A Universal Localization Mechanism
Open accessAbstract
Nanoparticles offer clear advantages for both passive and active penetration into biologically important membranes. However, the uptake and localization mechanism of nanoparticles within living plants, plant cells, and organelles has yet to be elucidated.1 Here, we examine the subcellular uptake and kinetic trapping of a wide range of nanoparticles for the first time, using the plant chloroplast as a model system, but validated in vivo in living plants. Confocal visible and near-infrared fluorescent microscopy and single particle tracking of gold-cysteine-AF405 (GNP-Cys-AF405), streptavidin-quantum dot (SA-QD), dextran and poly(acrylic acid) nanoceria, and various polymer-wrapped single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), including lipid-PEG-SWCNT, chitosan-SWCNT and 30-base (dAdT) sequence of ssDNA (AT)15 wrapped SWCNTs (hereafter referred to as ss(AT)15-SWCNT), are used to demonstrate that particle size and the magnitude, but not the sign, of the zeta potential are key in determining whether a particle is spontaneously and kinetically trapped within the organelle, despite the negative zeta potential of the envelope. We develop a mathematical model of this lipid exchange envelope and penetration (LEEP) mechanism, which agrees well with observations of this size and zeta potential dependence. The theory predicts a critical particle size below which the mechanism fails at all zeta potentials, explaining why nanoparticles are critical for this process. LEEP constitutes a powerful particulate transport and localization mechanism for nanoparticles within the plant system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid
WATSON, J. D., & CRICK, F. H. C. (1953) · Nature · doi:10.1038/171737a0 · Cited by 13,584
Optical Detection of DNA Conformational Polymorphism on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
Heller, D. A., Jeng, E. S., Yeung, T.-K., Martinez, B. M., Moll, A. E., Gastala, J. B., & Strano, M. S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1120792 · Cited by 505
Self-citation
Cited by
Wu, H., Tito, N., & Giraldo, J. P. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b05723 · Cited by 533
Self-citationChitosan Effects on Plant Systems
Malerba, M., & Cerana, R. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17070996 · Cited by 528
Avellan, A., Yun, J., Morais, B. P., Clement, E. T., Rodrigues, S. M., & Lowry, G. V. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00178 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, M. H., Misra, R. P., Giraldo, J. P., Kwak, S.-Y., Son, Y., Landry, M. P., Swan, J. W., Blankschtein, D., & Strano, M. S.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-01-26
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1161-1172
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2237004137
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lipid Exchange Envelope Penetration (LEEP) of Nanoparticles for Plant Engineering: A Universal Localization Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04467
- The paper
- Wong, M. H., Misra, R. P., Giraldo, J. P., Kwak, S.-Y., Son, Y., Landry, M. P., Swan, J. W., Blankschtein, D., & Strano, M. S. (2016). Lipid Exchange Envelope Penetration (LEEP) of Nanoparticles for Plant Engineering: A Universal Localization Mechanism. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04467
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.