Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Density Nanosharp Microstructures Enable Efficient CO2 Electroreduction

Open access
Saberi Safaei, Tina, Mepham, Adam, Zheng, Xueli, Pang, Yuanjie, Dinh, Cao-Thang, Liu, Min, Sinton, David, Kelley, Shana O., Sargent, Edward H.·2016·Nano Letters

Abstract

Conversion of CO 2 to CO powered by renewable electricity not only reduces CO 2 pollution but also is a means to store renewable energy via chemical production of fuels from CO. However, the kinetics of this reaction are slow due its large energetic barrier. We have recently reported CO 2 reduction that is considerably enhanced via local electric field concentration at the tips of sharp gold nanostructures. The high local electric field enhances CO 2 concentration at the catalytic active sites, lowering the activation barrier. Here we engineer the nucleation and growth of next-generation Au nanostructures. The electroplating overpotential was manipulated to generate an appreciably increased density of honed nanoneedles. Using this approach, we report the first application of sequential electrodeposition to increase the density of sharp tips in CO 2 electroreduction. Selective regions of the primary nanoneedles are passivated using a thiol SAM (self-assembled monolayer), and then growth is concentrated atop the uncovered high-energy planes, providing new nucleation sites that ultimately lead to an increase in the density of the nanosharp structures. The two-step process leads to a new record in CO 2 to CO reduction, with a geometric current density of 38 mA/cm 2 at −0.4 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode), and a 15-fold improvement over the best prior reports of electrochemical surface area (ECSA) normalized current density.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03615

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Saberi Safaei, T., Mepham, A., Zheng, X., Pang, Y., Dinh, C.-T., Liu, M., Sinton, D., Kelley, S. O., & Sargent, E. H.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2016-10-17
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
7224-7228
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2531688930
Cited by
196
References
5
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Density Nanosharp Microstructures Enable Efficient CO2 Electroreduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03615
The paper
Saberi Safaei, T., Mepham, A., Zheng, X., Pang, Y., Dinh, C.-T., Liu, M., Sinton, D., Kelley, S. O., & Sargent, E. H. (2016). High-Density Nanosharp Microstructures Enable Efficient CO2 Electroreduction. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03615

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.