Cited by 395CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Highly Dense Cu Nanowires for Low-Overpotential CO 2 Reduction

Raciti, David, Livi, Kenneth J., Wang, Chao·2015·Nano Letters

Abstract

Electrochemical reduction of CO2, an artificial way of carbon recycling, represents one promising solution for energy and environmental sustainability. However, it is challenged by the lack of active and selective catalysts. Here, we report a two-step synthesis of highly dense Cu nanowires as advanced electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. CuO nanowires were first grown by oxidation of Cu mesh in air and then reduced by either annealing in the presence of hydrogen or applying a cathodic electrochemical potential to produce Cu nanowires. The two reduction methods generated Cu nanowires with similar dimensions but distinct surface structures, which have provided an ideal platform for comparative studies of the effect of surface structure on the electrocatalytic properties. In particular, the Cu nanowires generated by electrochemical reduction were highly active and selective for CO2 reduction, requiring an overpotential of only 0.3 V to reach 1 mA/cm(2) electrode current density and achieving Faradaic efficiency toward CO as high as ∼60%. Our work has advanced the understanding of the structure-property relationship of Cu-based nanocatalysts, which could be valuable for the further development of advanced electrocatalytic materials for CO2 reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03298

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raciti, D., Livi, K. J., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chao
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
6829-6835
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2331744161
Cited by
395
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Environment, Energy, Sustainability and Health Institute, Johns Hopkins University
  • Oak Ridge Associated Universities
  • Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET-1437219)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
CO2 reduction, copper nanowires, electrocatalysts, CuO nanowires, electrochemical reduction, hydrogen annealing, surface structure, CO selectivity, Faradaic efficiency, overpotential, structure-property relationships, carbon recycling
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Catalysis, Copper, Nanowires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review