Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategic Structural Design of a Gel Polymer Electrolyte toward a High Efficiency Lithium-Ion Battery

Baskoro, Febri, Wong, Hui Qi, Yen, Hung-Ju·2019·ACS Applied Energy Materials
DOI 10.1021/acsaem.9b00295
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Electrolytes have played critical roles in electrochemical energy storage. In Li-ion battery, liquid electrolytes have shown their excellent performances over decades, such as high ionic conductivity (∼10 –3 S cm –1 ) and good contacts with electrodes. However, the use of liquid electrolytes often brought risks associated with leakage and combustion of organic electrolytes. Hence, polymer electrolytes become potential candidates to replace liquid electrolyte systems. Although solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) offer better safety and good mechanical properties to take over liquid electrolytes, most of them only deliver low ionic conductivities (∼10 –8 S cm –1 ) and poor contact with electrodes, resulting in poor cycle performance and low electrical capacity of the batteries. In addition, gel polymer electrolytes (GPEs) have received increasing research attention due to their relevant characteristics, which extend from liquid electrolytes and solid polymer electrolytes. In this review, state-of-the-art samples of gel polymer electrolytes are elucidated with respect to their structural design and electrochemical properties to determine their application potential in Li-ion batteries (LIBs). First, we present the general requirements of GPEs for LIBs applications, followed by important electrochemical properties of GPEs for LIBs including ionic conductivity, transference number, and ionic transport mechanisms. Furthermore, recent progress of common polymers, namely, polyether, polyvinyl, polynitrile, polycarbonate, and polyacrylate, as polymer host of GPEs has been carefully explained. Finally, the alternative polymers were also discussed to provide new approaches for further developments of GPEs to fulfill the demanded properties for practical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsaem.9b00295

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Baskoro, F., Wong, H. Q., & Yen, H.-J.
Venue
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2019-05-02
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
3937-3971
ISSN
2574-0962 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1021/acsaem.9b00295
OpenAlex
W2943640868
Cited by
258
References
77
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.