The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Performance of Flexible PVDF-TrFE Bilayer Films with Graphene Oxide
Abstract
Ferroelectric materials have attracted interest in recent years due to their application in energy harvesting owing to its piezoelectric nature. Ferroelectric polymers are flexible and can sustain larger strains compared to inorganic counterparts, making them attractive for harvesting energy from mechanical vibrations. Herein, we report, for the first time, the enhanced piezoelectric energy harvesting performance of the bilayer films of poled poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) [PVDF-TrFE] and graphene oxide (GO). The bilayer film exhibits superior energy harvesting performance with a voltage output of 4 V and power output of 4.41 μWcm(-2) compared to poled PVDF-TrFE films alone (voltage output of 1.9 V and power output of 1.77 μWcm(-2)). The enhanced voltage and power output in the presence of GO film is due to the combined effect of electrostatic contribution from graphene oxide, residual tensile stress, enhanced Young's modulus of the bilayer films, and the presence of space charge at the interface of the PVDF-TrFE and GO films, arising from the uncompensated polarization of PVDF-TrFE. Higher Young's modulus and dielectric constant of GO led to the efficient transfer of mechanical and electrical energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Piezoelectric Nanogenerators Based on Zinc Oxide Nanowire Arrays
Wang, Z. L., & Song, J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1124005 · Cited by 7,922
Persano, L., Dagdeviren, C., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., Girardo, S., Pisignano, D., Huang, Y., & Rogers, J. A. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2639 · Cited by 1,271
Mechanical Properties of Monolayer Graphene Oxide
Suk, J. W., Piner, R. D., An, J., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn101781v · Cited by 1,194
Qi, Y., Kim, J., Nguyen, T. D., Lisko, B., Purohit, P. K., & McAlpine, M. C. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl104412b · Cited by 516
Cited by
Advances in Piezoelectric Polymer Composites for Energy Harvesting Applications: A Systematic Review
Mishra, S., Unnikrishnan, L., Nayak, S. K., & Mohanty, S. (2019) · Macromolecular Materials and Engineering · doi:10.1002/mame.201800463 · Cited by 556
Shi, K., Sun, B., Huang, X., & Jiang, P. (2018) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.053 · Cited by 517
Yang, Y., Pan, H., Xie, G., Jiang, Y., Chen, C., Su, Y., Wang, Y., & Tai, H. (2020) · Sensors and Actuators A: Physical · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2019.111789 · Cited by 496
Guan, X., Xu, B., & Gong, J. (2020) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104516 · Cited by 359
A review of ceramic, polymer and composite piezoelectric materials
Habib, M., Lantgios, I., & Hornbostel, K. (2022) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ac8687 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhavanasi, V., Kumar, V., Parida, K., Wang, J., & Lee, P. S.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-12-22
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 521-529
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2199146412
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
