The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advanced Fabrication Method for the Preparation of MOF Thin Films: Liquid-Phase Epitaxy Approach Meets Spin Coating Method
Abstract
Here, we report a new and advanced method for the fabrication of highly oriented/polycrystalline metal-organic framework (MOF) thin films. Building on the attractive features of the liquid-phase epitaxy (LPE) approach, a facile spin coating method was implemented to generate MOF thin films in a high-throughput fashion. Advantageously, this approach offers a great prospective to cost-effectively construct thin-films with a significantly shortened preparation time and a lessened chemicals and solvents consumption, as compared to the conventional LPE-process. Certainly, this new spin-coating approach has been implemented successfully to construct various MOF thin films, ranging in thickness from a few micrometers down to the nanometer scale, spanning 2-D and 3-D benchmark MOF materials including Cu2(bdc)2·xH2O, Zn2(bdc)2·xH2O, HKUST-1, and ZIF-8. This method was appraised and proved effective on a variety of substrates comprising functionalized gold, silicon, glass, porous stainless steel, and aluminum oxide. The facile, high-throughput and cost-effective nature of this approach, coupled with the successful thin film growth and substrate versatility, represents the next generation of methods for MOF thin film fabrication. Therefore, paving the way for these unique MOF materials to address a wide range of challenges in the areas of sensing devices and membrane technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liu, J., & Wöll, C. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00315c · Cited by 698
Advances in metal–organic framework-based membranes
Cheng, Y., Datta, S. J., Zhou, S., Jia, J., Shekhah, O., & Eddaoudi, M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00031h · Cited by 423
Self-citationMicroporous framework membranes for precise molecule/ion separations
Dou, H., Xu, M., Wang, B., Zhang, Z., Wen, G., Zheng, Y., Luo, D., Zhao, L., Yu, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00552e · Cited by 371
Heinke, L., & Wöll, C. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201806324 · Cited by 192
Metal organic frameworks for hydrogen purification
Mao, D., Griffin, J. M., Dawson, R., Fairhurst, A., & Bimbo, N. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.181 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Chernikova, V., Shekhah, O., & Eddaoudi, M.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-07-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 20459-20464
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2472172567
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.