The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D-Printed Zeolite Monoliths for CO2 Removal from Enclosed Environments
Abstract
Structured adsorbents, especially in the form of monolithic contactors, offer an excellent gas–solid contacting strategy for the development of practical and scalable CO 2 capture technologies. In this study, the fabrication of three-dimensional (3D)-printed 13X and 5A zeolite monoliths with novel structures and their use in CO 2 removal from air are reported. The physical and structural properties of these printed monoliths are evaluated and compared with their powder counterparts. Our results indicate that 3D-printed monoliths with zeolite loadings as high as 90 wt % exhibit adsorption uptake that is comparable to that of powder sorbents. The adsorption capacities of 5A and 13X monoliths were found to be 1.59 and 1.60 mmol/g, respectively, using 5000 ppm (0.5%) CO 2 in nitrogen at room temperature. The dynamic CO 2 /N 2 breakthrough experiments show relatively fast dynamics for monolithic structures. In addition, the printed zeolite monoliths show reasonably good mechanical stability that can eventually prevent attrition and dusting issues commonly encountered in traditional pellets and beads packing systems. The 3D printing technique offers an alternative, cost-effective, and facile approach to fabricate structured adsorbents with tunable structural, chemical, and mechanical properties for use in gas separation processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources
Choi, S., Drese, J. H., & Jones, C. W. (2009) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.200900036 · Cited by 2,596
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Bioactive glass in tissue engineering
Rahaman, M. N., Day, D. E., Sonny Bal, B., Fu, Q., Jung, S. B., Bonewald, L. F., & Tomsia, A. P. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 · Cited by 1,794
Additive Manufacturing of Ceramic‐Based Materials
Travitzky, N., Bonet, A., Dermeik, B., Fey, T., Filbert‐Demut, I., Schlier, L., Schlordt, T., & Greil, P. (2014) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201400097 · Cited by 878
The application of monoliths for gas phase catalytic reactions
Heck, R. M., Gulati, S., & Farrauto, R. J. (2001) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/s1385-8947(00)00365-x · Cited by 402
Structured adsorbents in gas separation processes
Rezaei, F., & Webley, P. (2010) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.004 · Cited by 294
Self-citationAnalysis of Equilibrium-Based TSA Processes for Direct Capture of CO2 from Air
Kulkarni, A. R., & Sholl, D. S. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie300691c · Cited by 219
3D printing of a heterogeneous copper-based catalyst
Tubío, C. R., Azuaje, J., Escalante, L., Coelho, A., Guitián, F., Sotelo, E., & Gil, A. (2016) · Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.11.019 · Cited by 214
Optimum structured adsorbents for gas separation processes
Rezaei, F., & Webley, P. (2009) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2009.08.029 · Cited by 210
Self-citationSachse, A., Ameloot, R., Coq, B., Fajula, F., Coasne, B., De Vos, D., & Galarneau, A. (2012) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c2cc17190b · Cited by 158
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Carbon Capture From Flue Gas and the Atmosphere: A Perspective
Wang, X., & Song, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.560849 · Cited by 428
Utilization of zeolites as CO2 capturing agents: Advances and future perspectives
Kumar, S., Srivastava, R., & Koh, J. (2020) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101251 · Cited by 405
Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Structured Materials for Adsorption and Catalysis Applications.
Lawson, S., Li, X., Thakkar, H., Rownaghi, A. A., & Rezaei, F. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00060 · Cited by 341
Self-citationRuiz-Morales, J. C., Tarancón, A., Canales-Vázquez, J., Méndez-Ramos, J., Hernández-Afonso, L., Acosta-Mora, P., Marín Rueda, J. R., & Fernández-González, R. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee03526d · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Thakkar, H., Eastman, S., Hajari, A., Rownaghi, A. A., Knox, J. C., & Rezaei, F.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-10-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 27753-27761
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2521366826
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 19.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D-Printed Zeolite Monoliths for CO2 Removal from Enclosed Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsami.6b09647
- The paper
- Thakkar, H., Eastman, S., Hajari, A., Rownaghi, A. A., Knox, J. C., & Rezaei, F. (2016). 3D-Printed Zeolite Monoliths for CO2 Removal from Enclosed Environments. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b09647
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
