Cited by 164Supercapacitor Materials and FabricationMXene and MAX Phase MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mixed 1T–2H Phase MoS2/Reduced Graphene Oxide as Active Electrode for Enhanced Supercapacitive Performance

Abstract

A hybrid aerogel, composed of MoS 2 sheets of 1T (distorted octahedral) and 2H (trigonal prismatic) phases, finely mixed with few layers of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and obtained by means of a facile environment-friendly hydrothermal cosynthesis, is proposed as electrode material for supercapacitors. By electrochemical characterizations in three- and two-electrode configurations and symmetric planar devices, unique results have been obtained, with specific capacitance values up to 416 F g -1 and a highly stable capacitance behavior over 50000 charge-discharge cycles. The in-depth morphological and structural characterizations through field emission scanning electron microscopy, Raman, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller, and transmission electron microscopy analysis provides the proofs of the unique assembly of such 3D structured matrix. The unpacked MoS 2 structure exhibits an excellent distribution of 1T and 2H phase sheets that are highly exposed to interaction with the electrolyte, and so available for surface/near-surface redox reactions, notwithstanding the quite low overall content of MoS 2 embedded in the reduced graphene oxide (rGO) matrix. A comparison with other "more conventional" hybrid rGO-MoX 2 electrochemically active materials, synthesized in the same conditions, is provided to support the outstanding behavior of the cosynthesized rGO-MoS 2 .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.6b11290

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Graphene-based nanocomposites have the potential to ameliorate energy storage devices by leveraging the ample specific surface area of graphene and Faradaic redox reactions of TMDs or LDHs.

    “Such graphene-based nanocomposites have the potential to ameliorate energy storage devices by leveraging the ample specific surface area of graphene and Faradaic redox reactions of TMDs or LDHs.27−32”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gigot, A., Fontana, M., Serrapede, M., Castellino, M., Bianco, S., Armandi, M., Bonelli, B., Pirri, C. F., Tresso, E., & Rivolo, P.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
Corresponding author
Rivolo, Paola
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
8
Issue
48
Pages
32842-32852
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2553462613
Cited by
164
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 7
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › MXene and MAX Phase Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
MoS2, reduced graphene oxide, supercapacitor electrodes, hybrid aerogels, specific capacitance, cycling stability, MoS2/rGO composite

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review