Cited by 60Organic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry

Modifying the Chemical Structure of a Porphyrin Small Molecule with Benzothiophene Groups for the Reproducible Fabrication of High Performance Solar Cells

Liang, Tianxiang, Xiao, Liangang, Gao, Ke, Xu, Wenzhan, Peng, Xiaobin, Cao, Yong·2017·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

A porphyrin-based molecule DPPEZnP-BzTBO with bulky benzothiophene groups was designed and synthesized as an electron donor material for bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells. The optimized devices under thermal annealing (TA) and then chloroform solvent vapor anneanling (SVA) for 80 s exhibited an outstanding power conversion efficiencie (PCE) of 9.08%. Contrasted with the smaller thienyl substituted analogues we reported previously, DPPEZnP-BzTBO-based BHJ solar cells exhibited a higher open circuit voltage due to the lower highest occupied molecular orbital energy level. The TA post-treatment of the active layers induced the formation of more crystallized components, and the subsequent SVA provided a driving force for the domain growth, resulting in more obvious phase segregation between the donor and the acceptor in nanoscale. Furthermore, the PCEs kept above 95% upon the further SVA treatment within the time range of 60 to 95 s probably because the bulky benzothiophene groups retard the too quick change of crystallinity, providing a wide processing window for the reproducible device fabrication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.6b15241

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The optimized D9 device exhibited a PCE of 9.08% after thermal annealing and chloroform solvent vapor annealing for 80 s.

    “The optimized device upon thermal annealing and then chloroform solvent vapor annealing for 80 s exhibited an outstanding PCE of 9.08%.”
  • The incorporation of these materials as electron donors has resulted in an increased PCE of 9%.

    “The incorporation of these materials as electron donors has resulted in an increased PCE of 9%.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, T., Xiao, L., Gao, K., Xu, W., Peng, X., & Cao, Y.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices (CN)
Corresponding author
Peng, Xiaobin
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2017-02-17
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
7131-7138
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2586073638
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2010DFA52150, 2013DFG52740)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51073060, 51473053)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Keywords
electron donor materials, bulk heterojunction solar cells, annealing, solvent vapor annealing, power conversion efficiency, open-circuit voltage, HOMO energy level, phase segregation, crystallinity, process window, device reproducibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review