Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Silicones for Stretchable and Durable Soft Devices: Beyond Sylgard-184

Park, Sungjune, Mondal, Kunal, Treadway, Robert M., Kumar, Vikash, Ma, Siyuan, Holbery, James D., Dickey, Michael D.·2018·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

This paper identifies and characterizes silicone elastomers that are well-suited for fabricating highly stretchable and tear-resistant devices that require interfacial bonding by plasma or UV ozone treatment. The ability to bond two or more pieces of molded silicone is important for creating microfluidic channels, chambers for pneumatically driven soft robotics, and other soft and stretchable devices. Sylgard-184 is a popular silicone, particularly for microfluidic applications. However, its low elongation at break (∼100% strain) and moderate tear strength (∼3 N/mm) make it unsuitable for emerging, mechanically demanding applications of silicone. In contrast, commercial silicones, such as Dragon Skin, have excellent mechanical properties yet are difficult to plasma-bond, likely because of the presence of silicone oils that soften the network yet migrate to the surface and interfere with plasma bonding. We found that extracting silicone oligomers from these soft networks allows these materials to bond but only when the Shore hardness exceeds a value of 15 A. It is also possible to mix highly stretchable silicones (Dragon Skin and Ecoflex) with Sylgard-184 to create silicones with intermediate mechanical properties; interestingly, these blends also only bond when the hardness exceeds 15 A. Eight different Pt-cured silicones were also screened; again, only those with Shore hardness above 15 A plasma-bond. The most promising silicones from this study are Sylgard-186 and Elastosil-M4130 and M4630, which exhibit a large deformation (>200% elongation at break), high tear strength (>12 N/mm), and strong plasma bonding. To illustrate the utility of these silicones, we created stretchable electrodes by injecting a liquid metal into microchannels created using such silicones, which may find use in soft robotics, electronic skin, and stretchable energy storage devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.7b18394

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Park, S., Mondal, K., Treadway, R. M., Kumar, V., Ma, S., Holbery, J. D., & Dickey, M. D.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2018-03-26
Volume
10
Issue
13
Pages
11261-11268
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2793338198
Cited by
227
References
4
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.