Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly Sensitive and Flexible Strain–Pressure Sensors with Cracked Paddy-Shaped MoS2/Graphene Foam/Ecoflex Hybrid Nanostructures

Kim, Seong Jun, Mondal, Shuvra, Min, Bok Ki, Choi, Choon-Gi·2018·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Three-dimensional graphene porous networks (GPNs) have received considerable attention as a nanomaterial for wearable touch sensor applications because of their outstanding electrical conductivity and mechanical stability. Herein, we demonstrate a strain–pressure sensor with high sensitivity and durability by combining molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) and Ecoflex with a GPN. The planar sheets of MoS 2 bonded to the GPN were conformally arranged with a cracked paddy shape, and the MoS 2 nanoflakes were formed on the planar sheet. The size and density of the MoS 2 nanoflakes were gradually increased by raising the concentration of (NH 4 ) 2 MoS 4 . We found that this conformal nanostructure of MoS 2 on the GPN surface can produce improved resistance variation against external strain and pressure. Consequently, our MoS 2 /GPN/Ecoflex sensors exhibited noticeably improved sensitivity compared to previously reported GPN/polydimethylsiloxane sensors in a pressure test because of the existence of the conformal planar sheet of MoS 2 . In particular, the MoS 2 /GPN/Ecoflex sensor showed a high sensitivity of 6.06 kPa –1 at a (NH 4 ) 2 MoS 4 content of 1.25 wt %. At the same time, it displayed excellent durability even under repeated loading–unloading pressure and bending over 4000 cycles. When the sensor was attached on a human temple and neck, it worked correctly as a drowsiness detector in response to motion signals such as neck bending and eye blinking. Finally, a 3 × 3 tactile sensor array showed precise touch sensing capability with complete isolation of electrodes from each other for application to touch electronic applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.8b11233

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S. J., Mondal, S., Min, B. K., & Choi, C.-G.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2018-09-27
Volume
10
Issue
42
Pages
36377-36384
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2893169053
Cited by
175
References
4
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.