Cited by 28Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesNanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

Wafer-Scale Multilayer Fabrication for Silk Fibroin-Based Microelectronics

Kook, Geon, Jeong, Sohyeon, Kim, So Hyun, Kim, Mi Kyung, Lee, Sungwoo, Cho, Il-Joo, Choi, Nakwon, Lee, Hyunjoo J.·2019·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Silk fibroin is an excellent candidate for biomedical implantable devices because of its biocompatibility, controllable biodegradability, solution processability, flexibility, and transparency. Thus, fibroin has been widely explored in biomedical applications as biodegradable films as well as functional microstructures. Although there exists a large number of patterning methods for fibroin thin films, multilayer micropatterning of fibroin films interleaved with metal layers still remains a challenge. Herein, we report a new wafer-scale multilayer microfabrication process named aluminum hard mask on silk fibroin (AMoS), which is capable of micropatterning multiple layers composed of both fibroin and inorganic materials (e.g., metal and dielectrics) with high-precision microscale alignment. To the best of our knowledge, our AMoS process is the first demonstration of wafer-scale multilayer processing of both silk fibroin and metal micropatterns. In the AMoS process, aluminum deposited on fibroin is first micropatterned using conventional ultraviolet (UV) photolithography, and the patterned aluminum layer is then used as a mask to pattern fibroin underneath. We demonstrate the versatility of our fabrication process by fabricating fibroin microstructures with different dimensions, passive electronic components composed of both fibroin and metal layers, and functional fibroin microstructures for drug delivery. Furthermore, because one of the crucial advantages of fibroin is biocompatibility, we assess the biocompatibility of our fabrication process through the culture of highly susceptible primary neurons. Because the AMoS process utilizes conventional UV photolithography, the principal advantages of our process are multilayer fabrication with high-precision alignment, high resolution, wafer-scale large area processing, no requirement for chemical modification of the protein, and high throughput and thus low cost, all of which have not been feasible with silk fibroin. Therefore, the proposed fabrication method is a promising candidate for batch fabrication of functional fibroin microelectronics (e.g., memristors and organic thin film transistors) for next-generation implantable biomedical applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.8b13170

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kook, G., Jeong, S., Kim, S. H., Kim, M. K., Lee, S., Cho, I.-J., Choi, N., & Lee, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Center for BioMicrosystems, Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), 5 Hwarang-ro 14 gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
  • School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author
  • Choi, Nakwon
  • Lee, Hyunjoo J.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
115-124
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2902891371
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Health Industry Development Institute (HI15C3155)
  • Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning (2017R1A5A1014708, 2016R1C1B2009798)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
Keywords
silk fibroin, wafer-scale patterning, micropatterning, UV lithography, biomedical implants, drug delivery, biocompatibility, primary neurons, passive components, memristors, organic thin-film transistors
MeSH terms
Animals, Electronics, Fibroins, Materials Testing, Neurons, Drug Delivery Systems, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review