The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facile, Flexible, Cost-Saving, and Environment-Friendly Paper-Based Humidity Sensor for Multifunctional Applications
Abstract
Developing a facile, cost-saving, and environment-friendly method for fabricating a multifunctional humidity sensor is of great significance to expand its practical applications. However, most humidity sensors involve a complex fabrication process, resulting in their high cost and narrow application fields. Herein, a multifunctional paper-based humidity sensor with many advantages is proposed. This humidity sensor is fabricated using conventional printing paper and flexible conductive adhesive tape by a facile pasting method, in which the paper is used as both the humidity-sensing material and the substrate of the sensor. Owing to the moderate hydrophilicity of the paper and the rational structure design of the paper-based humidity sensor, the sensor exhibits an excellent humidity-sensing response of more than 10 3 as well as good linearity ( R 2 = 0.9549) within the humidity range from 41.1 to 91.5% relative humidity. Furthermore, the paper-based humidity sensor has good flexibility and compatibility, endowing it with multifunctional applications for breath rate, baby diaper wetting, noncontact switch, skin humidity, and spatial localization monitoring. Although the resistance of the paper-based humidity sensor is relatively large, the humidity-sensing response signals of the sensor can be conveniently processed by the designed signal processing system. The readily available starting materials and facile fabrication technique provide useful strategies for the development of multifunctional humidity sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Paper‐Based Electrical Respiration Sensor
Güder, F., Ainla, A., Redston, J., Mosadegh, B., Glavan, A., Martin, T. J., & Whitesides, G. M. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201511805 · Cited by 472
Zhang, J., Wang, X.-X., Zhang, B., Ramakrishna, S., Yu, M., Ma, J.-W., & Long, Y.-Z. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b01718 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Evolution of breath analysis based on humidity and gas sensors: Potential and challenges
Tai, H., Wang, S., Duan, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2020) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2020.128104 · Cited by 412
Self-citationHydrogel-Based Gas Sensors for NO 2 and NH 3
Zhi, H., Gao, J., & Feng, L. (2020) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.9b02383 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Duan, Z., Jiang, Y., Yan, M., Wang, S., Yuan, Z., Zhao, Q., Sun, P., Xie, G., Du, X., & Tai, H.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-05-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 21840-21849
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2947198978
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.