Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Limits of Detection for EXAFS Characterization of Heterogeneous Single-Atom Catalysts

Finzel, Jordan, Sanroman Gutierrez, Kenzie M., Hoffman, Adam S., Resasco, Joaquin, Christopher, Phillip, Bare, Simon R.·2023·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Single-atom catalysts (SACs), consisting of individual metal atoms dispersed on a support, attract attention due to their unique reactivity, efficient use of precious metals, and precise chemical tunability. Characterization of the metal species is crucial to substantiate structure–function relationships. Authors often use─and referees often require─X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) data to prove the absence of clustered metal (or metal oxide) structures after pre-treatment and under in situ or operando conditions. However, there has been no critical assessment of the limitations of XAS in substantiating such conclusive statements, which is particularly important given the potential outsized influence of minority catalyst structures in dictating catalytic activity. In this article, we quantitatively assess the detection limits of XAS to identify metal (or metal oxide) clusters in samples containing predominantly single atoms by modeling the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) of mixtures of structures. We identified that a significant fraction of clusters can coexist with SAC active sites (e.g., ∼10% metallic Pt or ∼40% oxidized Pt clusters in Pt/CeO 2 SACs), while eluding detection via EXAFS with any statistical significance. To generalize these conclusions, a descriptor-based screening of bulk metal oxides using a continuous Cauchy wavelet transform was proposed that suggests certain materials for which differentiating atomically dispersed metal species and metal oxide clusters would be infeasible by EXAFS (e.g., ReO x ). Based on this analysis, we suggest best practices for the study of SACs using EXAFS and provide recommendations to ensure that conclusions do not outpace the evidence used to support them. In this rapidly expanding research area, rigorous characterization will lead to greater understanding of the behavior of SACs and ultimately improved catalytic materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.3c01116

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Finzel, J., Sanroman Gutierrez, K. M., Hoffman, A. S., Resasco, J., Christopher, P., & Bare, S. R.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2023-04-26
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
6462-6473
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367055754
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
33.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.