The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limits of Detection for EXAFS Characterization of Heterogeneous Single-Atom Catalysts
Abstract
Single-atom catalysts (SACs), consisting of individual metal atoms dispersed on a support, attract attention due to their unique reactivity, efficient use of precious metals, and precise chemical tunability. Characterization of the metal species is crucial to substantiate structure–function relationships. Authors often use─and referees often require─X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) data to prove the absence of clustered metal (or metal oxide) structures after pre-treatment and under in situ or operando conditions. However, there has been no critical assessment of the limitations of XAS in substantiating such conclusive statements, which is particularly important given the potential outsized influence of minority catalyst structures in dictating catalytic activity. In this article, we quantitatively assess the detection limits of XAS to identify metal (or metal oxide) clusters in samples containing predominantly single atoms by modeling the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) of mixtures of structures. We identified that a significant fraction of clusters can coexist with SAC active sites (e.g., ∼10% metallic Pt or ∼40% oxidized Pt clusters in Pt/CeO 2 SACs), while eluding detection via EXAFS with any statistical significance. To generalize these conclusions, a descriptor-based screening of bulk metal oxides using a continuous Cauchy wavelet transform was proposed that suggests certain materials for which differentiating atomically dispersed metal species and metal oxide clusters would be infeasible by EXAFS (e.g., ReO x ). Based on this analysis, we suggest best practices for the study of SACs using EXAFS and provide recommendations to ensure that conclusions do not outpace the evidence used to support them. In this rapidly expanding research area, rigorous characterization will lead to greater understanding of the behavior of SACs and ultimately improved catalytic materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High performance platinum single atom electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction
Liu, J., Jiao, M., Lu, L., Barkholtz, H. M., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., Wu, Z., Liu, D.-J., Zhuang, L., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15938 · Cited by 772
Catalytic consequences of acid strength in the conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether
Carr, R. T., Neurock, M., & Iglesia, E. (2011) · Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.11.017 · Cited by 203
Cited by
Metal–support interactions in metal oxide-supported atomic, cluster, and nanoparticle catalysis
Leybo, D., Etim, U. J., Monai, M., Bare, S. R., Zhong, Z., & Vogt, C. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00527a · Cited by 417
Self-citationSurface engineering for stable electrocatalysis
Do, V.-H., & Lee, J.-M. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00292f · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Finzel, J., Sanroman Gutierrez, K. M., Hoffman, A. S., Resasco, J., Christopher, P., & Bare, S. R.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-04-26
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6462-6473
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4367055754
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.