The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Situ Raman Spectroscopy of Copper and Copper Oxide Surfaces during Electrochemical Oxygen Evolution Reaction: Identification of CuIII Oxides as Catalytically Active Species
Abstract
Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, in situ Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) were used to investigate the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on Cu, Cu 2 O, Cu(OH) 2, and CuO catalysts. Aqueous 0.1 M KOH was used as the electrolyte. All four catalysts were oxidized or converted to CuO and Cu(OH) 2 during a slow anodic sweep of cyclic voltammetry and exhibited similar activities for the OER. A Raman peak at 603 cm –1 appeared for all the four samples at OER-relevant potentials, ≥1.62 V vs RHE. This peak was identified as the Cu–O stretching vibration band of a Cu III oxide, a metastable species whose existence is dependent on the applied potential. Since this frequency matches well with that from a NaCu III O 2 standard, we suggest that the chemical composition of the Cu III oxide is CuO 2 – -like. The four catalysts, in stark contrast, did not oxidize the same way during direct chronoamperometry measurements at 1.7 V vs RHE. Cu III oxide was observed only on the CuO and Cu(OH) 2 electrodes. Interestingly, these two electrodes catalyzed the OER ∼10 times more efficiently than the Cu and Cu 2 O catalysts. By correlating the intensity of the Raman band of Cu III oxide and the extent of the OER activity, we propose that Cu III species provides catalytically active sites for the electrochemical water oxidation. The formation of Cu III oxides on CuO films during OER was also corroborated by in situ XANES measurements of the Cu K-edge. The catalytic role of Cu III oxide in the O 2 evolution reaction is proposed and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja407115p · Cited by 7,026
Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces
Man, I. C., Su, H., Calle‐Vallejo, F., Hansen, H. A., Martínez, J. I., Inoglu, N. G., Kitchin, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Nørskov, J. K., & Rossmeisl, J. (2011) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201000397 · Cited by 4,769
Cited by
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Suen, N.-T., Hung, S.-F., Quan, Q., Zhang, N., Xu, Y.-J., & Chen, H. M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00328a · Cited by 6,307
Metallic nanostructures with low dimensionality for electrochemical water splitting
Li, L., Wang, P., Shao, Q., & Huang, X. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00013b · Cited by 1,049
Recent development in electrocatalysts for hydrogen production through water electrolysis
Anwar, S., Khan, F., Zhang, Y., & Djire, A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.191 · Cited by 652
Heterogeneous‐Interface‐Enhanced Adsorption of Organic and Hydroxyl for Biomass Electrooxidation
Zhou, P., Lv, X., Tao, S., Wu, J., Wang, H., Wei, X., Wang, T., Zhou, B., Lu, Y., Frauenheim, T., et al. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202204089 · Cited by 570
Cheng, H., Li, M., Su, C., Li, N., & Liu, Z. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201701833 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, Y., Handoko, A. D., Du, Y., Xi, S., & Yeo, B. S.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-03-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2473-2481
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2295376186
- Cited by
- 1,057
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.