Pt Nanoparticle Anchored Molecular Self-Assemblies of DNA: An Extremely Stable and Efficient HER Electrocatalyst with Ultralow Pt Content
Abstract
An efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with ultralow loading of Pt has been under intense investigation to make the state-of-the-art Pt economically affordable for water electrolyzers. Here, colloidally synthesized Pt nanoparticles of average size 3.5 ± 0.3 nm were successfully anchored on molecular self-assemblies of DNA. The synthesized Pt@DNA colloidal solution was directly assessed for the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 with a loading of 5 μL of Pt@DNA colloidal solution that corresponds to a Pt equivalent of 15 μg/cm 2 . The excellent adhesion of DNA onto GC and FTO substrate electrodes, the conductivity of DNA, and its stability upon potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation have made the synthesized, stable Pt@DNA colloidal solution an advanced HER electrocatalyst. The Pt@DNA–GC interface without binder required overpotentials of −0.026 and −0.045 V for current densities of 10 and 20 mA/cm 2, respectively. The potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation tests did not affect the electrocatalytic activity, and the observed increase in overpotential was highly negligible. The extreme stability of the Pt@DNA–GC interface was witnessed during an aging study carried out by keeping the working electrode in the electrolyte solution for more than 10 days and acquiring linear sweep voltammograms (LSVs) at intervals of 24 h. Under the same experimental conditions, the commercial Pt/C 10 wt % c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrocatalysts with low Pt loading often suffer from low stability and short durability due to detachment and dissolution of Pt-NPs.
“However, such electrocatalysts often suffer from low stability and short durability due to the detachment and dissolution of Pt-NPs.[24–26]”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Sakthikumar, K., Karthick, K., Mishra, S., & Kundu, S. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02479 · Cited by 2,503 · see citing works
Self-citationAnantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Karthick, K., Sam Sankar, S., Sangeetha, K., Karthik, P. E., & Kundu, S. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee03457a · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
Self-citationHeterostructures for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Reaction: A Review
Zhao, G., Rui, K., Dou, S. X., & Sun, W. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201803291 · Cited by 1,422 · see citing works
Raveendran, A., Chandran, M., & Dhanusuraman, R. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra07642j · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Ďurovič, M., Hnát, J., & Bouzek, K. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229708 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Ultrastable MXene@Pt/SWCNTs' Nanocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Cui, C., Cheng, R., Zhang, H., Zhang, C., Ma, Y., Shi, C., Fan, B., Wang, H., & Wang, X. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202000693 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Highly Active 2D Layered MoS 2 -rGO Hybrids for Energy Conversion and Storage Applications
Kamila, S., Mohanty, B., Samantara, A. K., Guha, P., Ghosh, A., Jena, B., Satyam, P. V., Mishra, B. K., & Jena, B. K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08677-5 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Nickel selenides as pre-catalysts for electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction: A review
Anantharaj, S., & Noda, S. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.073 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, X., Jia, F., & Song, S. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127013 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Alsuhile, A., Pein, P. S., Barım, Ş. B., Bozbağ, S. E., Smirnova, I., Erkey, C., & Schroeter, B. (2025) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202400433 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anantharaj, S., Karthik, P. E., Subramanian, B., & Kundu, S.
- Affiliations
- Central Electrochemical Research Institute (IN)
- Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kundu, Subrata
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-06-20
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4660-4672
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2417659176
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Smith Richardson Foundation
- Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Keywords
- hydrogen evolution reaction, platinum nanoparticles, electrocatalysts, low platinum loading, colloidal synthesis, binder-free electrodes, glassy carbon electrode, electrocatalyst stability, water electrolysis, overpotential
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review