Cited by 244Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Pt Nanoparticle Anchored Molecular Self-Assemblies of DNA: An Extremely Stable and Efficient HER Electrocatalyst with Ultralow Pt Content

Anantharaj, Sengeni, Karthik, Pitchiah E., Subramanian, Balasubramanian, Kundu, Subrata·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

An efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with ultralow loading of Pt has been under intense investigation to make the state-of-the-art Pt economically affordable for water electrolyzers. Here, colloidally synthesized Pt nanoparticles of average size 3.5 ± 0.3 nm were successfully anchored on molecular self-assemblies of DNA. The synthesized Pt@DNA colloidal solution was directly assessed for the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 with a loading of 5 μL of Pt@DNA colloidal solution that corresponds to a Pt equivalent of 15 μg/cm 2 . The excellent adhesion of DNA onto GC and FTO substrate electrodes, the conductivity of DNA, and its stability upon potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation have made the synthesized, stable Pt@DNA colloidal solution an advanced HER electrocatalyst. The Pt@DNA–GC interface without binder required overpotentials of −0.026 and −0.045 V for current densities of 10 and 20 mA/cm 2, respectively. The potentiostatic electrolysis and accelerated degradation tests did not affect the electrocatalytic activity, and the observed increase in overpotential was highly negligible. The extreme stability of the Pt@DNA–GC interface was witnessed during an aging study carried out by keeping the working electrode in the electrolyte solution for more than 10 days and acquiring linear sweep voltammograms (LSVs) at intervals of 24 h. Under the same experimental conditions, the commercial Pt/C 10 wt % c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.6b00965

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anantharaj, S., Karthik, P. E., Subramanian, B., & Kundu, S.
Affiliations
  • Central Electrochemical Research Institute (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali (IN)
Corresponding author
Kundu, Subrata
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2016-06-20
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
4660-4672
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2417659176
Cited by
244
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Smith Richardson Foundation
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, platinum nanoparticles, electrocatalysts, low platinum loading, colloidal synthesis, binder-free electrodes, glassy carbon electrode, electrocatalyst stability, water electrolysis, overpotential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review