Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 519

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Peroxide Production from Molecular Oxygen on Nitrogen-Doped Mesoporous Carbon Catalysts

Sun, Yanyan, Sinev, Ilya, Ju, Wen, Bergmann, Arno, Dresp, Sören, Kühl, Stefanie, Spöri, Camillo, Schmies, Henrike, Wang, Huan, Bernsmeier, Denis, Paul, Benjamin, Schmack, Roman, Kraehnert, Ralph, Roldan Cuenya, Beatriz, Strasser, Peter·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Electrochemical hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) production by two-electron oxygen reduction is a promising alternative process to the established industrial anthraquinone process. Current challenges relate to finding cost-effective electrocatalysts with high electrocatalytic activity, stability, and product selectivity. Here, we explore the electrocatalytic activity and selectivity toward H 2 O 2 production of a number of distinct nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon catalysts and report a previously unachieved H 2 O 2 selectivity of ∼95–98% in acidic solution. To explain our observations, we correlate their structural, compositional, and other physicochemical properties with their electrocatalytic performance and uncover a close correlation between the H 2 O 2 product yield and the surface area and interfacial zeta potential. Nitrogen doping was found to sharply boost H 2 O 2 activity and selectivity. Chronoamperometric H 2 O 2 electrolysis confirms the exceptionally high H 2 O 2 production rate and large H 2 O 2 faradaic selectivity for the optimal nitrogen-doped CMK-3 sample in acidic, neutral, and alkaline solutions. In alkaline solution, the catalytic H 2 O 2 yield increases further, where the production rate of the HO 2 – anion reaches a value as high as 561.7 mmol g catalyst –1 h –1 with H 2 O 2 faradaic selectivity above 70%. Our work provides a guide for the design, synthesis, and mechanistic investigation of advanced carbon-based electrocatalysts for H 2 O 2 production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.7b03464

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Y., Sinev, I., Ju, W., Bergmann, A., Dresp, S., Kühl, S., Spöri, C., Schmies, H., Wang, H., Bernsmeier, D., Paul, B., Schmack, R., Kraehnert, R., Roldan Cuenya, B., & Strasser, P.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-02-21
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
2844-2856
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787972732
Cited by
519
References
2
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.