The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interface Tailoring of Heterogeneous Catalysts by Atomic Layer Deposition
Abstract
The tailoring of the metal–oxide interface is an important strategy in the design and development of novel catalysts with superior catalytic performance. However, the structure and location of the metal–oxide interface on supported catalysts cannot be well controlled by traditional methods, and the structure–property relation is not clearly understood in most reactions. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop new methods to precisely tailor the metal–oxide interface and thus achieve highly efficient catalysts and a fundamental understanding of the principle of interface catalysis. Atomic layer deposition (ALD), a high-level film-growth technology, is a promising and controllable approach to precisely design and tailor the metal–oxide interface on an atomic scale. In this Review, we present and discuss a series of recently developed ALD strategies for tailoring the metal–oxide interface of heterogeneous catalysts, such as overcoating, ultrathin modification, area-selective ALD, template-assisted ALD, and template- and sacrificial-layer-assisted ALD. These methods have been used to develop many catalysts with different structures, such as core–shell structures, inverse oxide/metal structures, oxide–nanotrapped metal structures, porous sandwich structures, multiply confined metal nanoparticles in oxide nanotubes, and multifunctional catalysts with multiple metal–oxide interfaces. Due to its advantages, ALD can be applied to reveal the catalytic mechanism of metal–oxide interfaces by deliberately designing catalysts with a clear structure, even in confined and synergetic environments. In general, the developed ALD approaches provide us with a toolkit for tailoring the metal–oxide interface and designing heterogeneous catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide
Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., & Garten, R. L. (1978) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00469a029 · Cited by 3,188
Platinum single-atom and cluster catalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction
Cheng, N., Stambula, S., Wang, D., Banis, M. N., Liu, J., Riese, A., Xiao, B., Li, R., Sham, T.-K., Liu, L.-M., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13638 · Cited by 2,072
Lu, J., Low, K.-B., Lei, Y., Libera, J. A., Nicholls, A., Stair, P. C., & Elam, J. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4264 · Cited by 233
Cited by
Control of metal-support interactions in heterogeneous catalysts to enhance activity and selectivity
van Deelen, T. W., Hernández Mejía, C., & de Jong, K. P. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0364-x · Cited by 2,349
Surface and Interface Control in Nanoparticle Catalysis
Xie, C., Niu, Z., Kim, D., Li, M., & Yang, P. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00220 · Cited by 864
Xu, Q., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Chen, L., Hu, Y., Jiang, H., & Li, C. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee02105b · Cited by 469
Spillover in Heterogeneous Catalysis: New Insights and Opportunities
Xiong, M., Gao, Z., & Qin, Y. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c05567 · Cited by 454
Self-citationZaera, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00905 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., & Qin, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-09-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 10064-10081
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891319196
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interface Tailoring of Heterogeneous Catalysts by Atomic Layer Deposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.8b02659
- The paper
- Zhang, B., & Qin, Y. (2018). Interface Tailoring of Heterogeneous Catalysts by Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b02659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.