Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational Design of Fe–N/C Hybrid for Enhanced Nitrogen Reduction Electrocatalysis under Ambient Conditions in Aqueous Solution

Wang, Ying, Cui, Xiaoqiang, Zhao, Jingxiang, Jia, Guangri, Gu, Lin, Zhang, Qinghua, Meng, Lingkun, Shi, Zhan, Zheng, Lirong, Wang, Chunyu, Zhang, Ziwei, Zheng, Weitao·2019·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Developing efficient noble-metal-free catalysts for the electrochemical N 2 reduction reaction (NRR) under ambient conditions shows promise in fertilizer production and hydrogen storage. Here, as a proof-of-concept prototype, we design and implement an Fe–N/C–carbon nanotube (CNT) catalyst derived from a metal–organic framework and carbon-nanotube-based composite with built-in Fe–N 3 active sites. This catalyst exhibits enhanced NRR activity with NH 3 production (34.83 μg·h –1 ·mg –1 cat. ), faradaic efficiency (9.28% at −0.2 V vs RHE), selectivity, and stability in 0.1 M KOH aqueous media under mild conditions. Experimental and theoretical results both reveal that Fe–N 3 species are the primary catalytically active centers for the NRR. This work provides insight into precise construction of more efficient and stable NRR electrocatalysts and further expands the possibilities of transition metal–nitrogen–carbon (M–N–C)-based nanomaterials in NRR fields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b03802

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Cui, X., Zhao, J., Jia, G., Gu, L., Zhang, Q., Meng, L., Shi, Z., Zheng, L., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., & Zheng, W.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-12-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
336-344
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901988749
Cited by
345
References
3
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.