The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does Nanomedicine Have a Delivery Problem?
Open accessAbstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVThe HubNEXTDoes Nanomedicine Have a Delivery Problem?Experts debate a controversial paper that suggests delivery efficiencies for cancer nanomedicines are low and not improving.Michael TorriceCite this: ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 7, 434–437Publication Date (Web):July 15, 2016Publication History Published online15 July 2016Published inissue 27 July 2016https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.6b00190Copyright © 2016 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSACS AuthorChoiceArticle Views6903Altmetric-Citations97LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (2 MB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Cancer,Nanomedicine,Nanoparticles,Pharmaceuticals,Tumors Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Minimum information reporting in bio–nano experimental literature
Faria, M., Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Kent, S. J., Parton, R. G., Kavallaris, M., Johnston, A. P. R., Gooding, J. J., Corrie, S. R., Boyd, B. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0246-4 · Cited by 710
Overcoming the Blood–Brain Barrier: The Role of Nanomaterials in Treating Neurological Diseases
Furtado, D., Björnmalm, M., Ayton, S., Bush, A. I., Kempe, K., & Caruso, F. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801362 · Cited by 708
Bridging Bio–Nano Science and Cancer Nanomedicine
Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Michael, M., Scott, A. M., & Caruso, F. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b04855 · Cited by 382
Ho, Y. T., Kamm, R. D., & Kah, J. C. Y. (2018) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c8nr02393j · Cited by 102
Fentahun Darge, H., Yibru Hanurry, E., Simegniew Birhan, Y., Worku Mekonnen, T., Tizazu Andrgie, A., Chou, H.-Y., Lai, J.-Y., & Tsai, H.-C. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126879 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Torrice, M.
- Venue
- ACS Central Science
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-07-15
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 434-437
- ISSN
- 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-7951
- OpenAlex
- W2462031667
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Nanomedicine Have a Delivery Problem? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscentsci.6b00190
- The paper
- Torrice, M. (2016). Does Nanomedicine Have a Delivery Problem? ACS Central Science. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.6b00190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
