The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uptake and Fate of Fluorescently Labeled DNA Nanostructures in Cellular Environments: A Cautionary Tale
Open accessAbstract
Fluorescent dye labeling of DNA oligonucleotides and nanostructures is one of the most used techniques to track their fate and cellular localization inside cells.Here, we report that intracellular fluorescence, and even FRET signals, cannot be correlated with the cellular uptake of intact DNA structures.Live cell imaging revealed high colocalization of cyanine-labeled DNA oligos and nanostructures with phosphorylated small-molecule cyanine dyes, one of the degradation products from these DNA compounds.Nuclease degradation of the strands outside and inside the cell results in a misleading intracellular fluorescent signal.The signal is saturated by the fluorescence of the degradation product (phosphorylated dye).To test our hypothesis, we synthesized a range of DNA structures, including Cy3-and Cy5-labeled DNA cubes and DNA tetrahedra, and oligonucleotides with different stabilities toward nucleases.All give fluorescence signals within the mitochondria after cellular uptake and strongly colocalize with a free phosphorylated dye control.Kinetics experiments revealed that uptake of stable DNA structures is delayed.We also studied several parameters influencing fluorescent data: stability of the DNA strand, fixation methods that can wash away the signal, position of the dye on the DNA strand, and design of FRET experiments.DNA nanostructures hold tremendous potential for biomedical applications and biotechnology because of their biocompatibility, programmability, and easy synthesis.However, few examples of successful DNA machines in vivo have been reported.We believe this contribution can be used as a guide to design better cellular uptake experiments when using fluorescent dyes, in order to further propel the biological development, and application of DNA nanostructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seeman, N. C., & Sleiman, H. F. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.68 · Cited by 1,875
Self-citationDNA nanotechnology from the test tube to the cell
Chen, Y.-J., Groves, B., Muscat, R. A., & Seelig, G. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.195 · Cited by 594
Cellular uptake and trafficking of antisense oligonucleotides
Crooke, S. T., Wang, S., Vickers, T. A., Shen, W., & Liang, X.-H. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3779 · Cited by 582
Visualization of the Cellular Uptake and Trafficking of DNA Origami Nanostructures in Cancer Cells
Wang, P., Rahman, M. A., Zhao, Z., Weiss, K., Zhang, C., Chen, Z., Hurwitz, S. J., Chen, Z. G., Shin, D. M., & Ke, Y. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b09024 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Nuclease resistance of DNA nanostructures
Chandrasekaran, A. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-021-00251-y · Cited by 382
Recent progress in non-native nucleic acid modifications
McKenzie, L. K., El-Khoury, R., Thorpe, J. D., Damha, M. J., & Hollenstein, M. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01430c · Cited by 300
Challenges and Perspectives of DNA Nanostructures in Biomedicine
Keller, A., & Linko, V. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201916390 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacroix, A., Vengut-Climent, E., de Rochambeau, D., & Sleiman, H. F.
- Venue
- ACS Central Science
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-04-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 882-891
- ISSN
- 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-7951
- OpenAlex
- W2942044904
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake and Fate of Fluorescently Labeled DNA Nanostructures in Cellular Environments: A Cautionary Tale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00174
- The paper
- Lacroix, A., Vengut-Climent, E., de Rochambeau, D., & Sleiman, H. F. (2019). Uptake and Fate of Fluorescently Labeled DNA Nanostructures in Cellular Environments: A Cautionary Tale. ACS Central Science. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.