Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective Inhibition of Collagen Prolyl 4-Hydroxylase in Human Cells

Vasta, James D., Andersen, Kristen A., Deck, Kathryn M., Nizzi, Christopher P., Eisenstein, Richard S., Raines, Ronald T.·2016·ACS Chemical Biology

Abstract

Collagen is the most abundant protein in animals. Its overproduction is associated with fibrosis and cancer metastasis. The stability of collagen relies on post-translational modifications, the most prevalent being the hydroxylation of collagen strands by collagen prolyl 4-hydroxylases (CP4Hs). Catalysis by CP4Hs enlists an iron cofactor to convert proline residues to 4-hydroxyproline residues, which are essential for the conformational stability of mature collagen. Ethyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate (EDHB) is commonly used as a "P4H" inhibitor in cells, but suffers from low potency, poor selectivity, and off-target effects that cause iron deficiency. Dicarboxylates of 2,2'-bipyridine are among the most potent known CP4H inhibitors but suffer from a high affinity for free iron. A screen of biheteroaryl compounds revealed that replacing one pyridyl group with a thiazole moiety retains potency and enhances selectivity. A diester of 2-(5-carboxythiazol-2-yl)pyridine-5-carboxylic acid is bioavailable to human cells and inhibits collagen biosynthesis at concentrations that neither cause general toxicity nor disrupt iron homeostasis. These data anoint a potent and selective probe for CP4H and a potential lead for the development of a new class of antifibrotic and antimetastatic agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschembio.5b00749

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1042/bj3530333 · DOI
  2. Sasaki T., 1987, J. Invest. Dermatol., 262, 9397
  3. Job P., 1928, Annali di Chimica Applicata, 9, 113

Cited by

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Vasta, J. D., Andersen, K. A., Deck, K. M., Nizzi, C. P., Eisenstein, R. S., & Raines, R. T.
Venue
ACS Chemical Biology
Published
2015-11-19
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
193-199
ISSN
  • 1554-8929
  • 1554-8937
Cited by
41
References
53
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK066600)
  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01 AR044276)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41 GM103399, T32 GM007215, T32 GM008688)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.