Cited by 14Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchChemical Analysis and Environmental ImpactFluoride Effects and Removal

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in the Fountain Creek Watershed, Colorado Springs, CO, USA: A Yearlong Investigation of PFAS Levels in Water, Soils, and Sediments

Quezada Davalos, Jose Caleb, Michaud, Michael A., Lowe, Luis E., Hanson, Emily N., Owens, Janel E.·2023·ACS ES&T Water

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination of water resources and impact on affected populations in the southern Colorado Springs metro area have been of research interest since initial reports were announced via local news outlets in 2016. In this study, surface water, soils, and sediments were collected monthly for a full year at eight locations within the Fountain Creek Watershed of Colorado Springs, CO, USA. Using a novel quantitative method, levels of nine PFASs were determined via liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Mean levels of ∑ 9 PFAS in water were 71.4 ng/L (median 57.9 ng/L) and ranged from 18.1 to 172.3 ng/L. Using these data, log K ow values, and % total organic carbon content, predicted levels of PFASs in soil and sediment samples were modeled. Actual concentrations via LC/MS/MS for PFASs in soils and sediments reflected previously reported metadata for solid samples affected by aqueous film-forming foam use and release. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) were detected in most (>87%) soils and all sediment samples. Predicted vs actual concentrations (ng/g dw ) of PFOS agreed extremely well for soil and sediment samples in this study, while agreement of predicted vs actual concentrations for PFOA was less robust. This latter observation motivated a follow-up study to assess whether, and to what extent, PFOA levels in affected vegetation at the survey sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00440

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quezada Davalos, J. C., Michaud, M. A., Lowe, L. E., Hanson, E. N., & Owens, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway, Colorado Springs, Colorado80918, United States
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Corresponding author
Owens, Janel E.
Venue
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2022-12-07
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
96-105
ISSN
2690-0637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311816589
Cited by
14
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS ES&T Water (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Chemistry (CHE-1429567)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS contamination, Colorado Springs, surface water, soil contamination, sediment contamination, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, aqueous film-forming foam, plant uptake, PFAS exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review