The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Optical, Electrochemical, Magnetic, and Colorimetric Point-of-Care Biosensors for Infectious Disease Diagnosis
Open accessAbstract
Each year, infectious diseases are responsible for millions of deaths, most of which occur in the rural areas of developing countries. Many of the infectious disease diagnostic tools used today require a great deal of time, a laboratory setting, and trained personnel. Due to this, the need for effective point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools is greatly increasing with an emphasis on affordability, portability, sensitivity, specificity, timeliness, and ease of use. In this Review, we discuss the various diagnostic modalities that have been utilized toward this end and are being further developed to create POC diagnostic technologies, and we focus on potential effectiveness in resource-limited settings. The main modalities discussed herein are optical-, electrochemical-, magnetic-, and colorimetric-based modalities utilized in diagnostic technologies for infectious diseases. Each of these modalities feature pros and cons when considering application in POC settings but, overall, reveal a promising outlook for the future of this field of technological development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Point-of-care tests for diagnosing infections in the developing world
Peeling, R. W., & Mabey, D. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03279.x · Cited by 500
Kelley, S. O., Mirkin, C. A., Walt, D. R., Ismagilov, R. F., Toner, M., & Sargent, E. H. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.261 · Cited by 398
Cited by
Paper Electrode-Based Flexible Pressure Sensor for Point-of-Care Immunoassay with Digital Multimeter
Yu, Z., Tang, Y., Cai, G., Ren, R., & Tang, D. (2019) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04635 · Cited by 341
Roshani, M., Rezaian-Isfahni, A., Lotfalizadeh, M. H., Khassafi, N., Abadi, M. H. J. N., & Nejati, M. (2023) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-023-03115-1 · Cited by 84
The application of nanoparticles in point-of-care testing (POCT) immunoassays
Hou, F., Sun, S., Abdullah, S. W., Tang, Y., Li, X., & Guo, H. (2023) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/d3ay00182b · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Pashchenko, O., Shelby, T., Banerjee, T., & Santra, S.
- Venue
- ACS Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-06-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1162-1178
- ISSN
- 2373-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807180755
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Optical, Electrochemical, Magnetic, and Colorimetric Point-of-Care Biosensors for Infectious Disease Diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00023
- The paper
- Pashchenko, O., Shelby, T., Banerjee, T., & Santra, S. (2018). A Comparison of Optical, Electrochemical, Magnetic, and Colorimetric Point-of-Care Biosensors for Infectious Disease Diagnosis. ACS Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
