Cited by 45Biosensors and Analytical DetectionSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Mobile Health (mHealth) Viral Diagnostics Enabled with Adaptive Adversarial Learning

Open access
Shokr, Ahmed, Pacheco, Luis G. C., Thirumalaraju, Prudhvi, Kanakasabapathy, Manoj Kumar, Gandhi, Jahnavi, Kartik, Deeksha, Silva, Filipe S. R., Erdogmus, Eda +7 more·2021·ACS Nano

Abstract

Deep-learning (DL)-based image processing has potential to revolutionize the use of smartphones in mobile health (mHealth) diagnostics of infectious diseases. However, the high variability in cellphone image data acquisition and the common need for large amounts of specialist-annotated images for traditional DL model training may preclude generalizability of smartphone-based diagnostics. Here, we employed adversarial neural networks with conditioning to develop an easily reconfigurable virus diagnostic platform that leverages a dataset of smartphone-taken microfluidic chip photos to rapidly generate image classifiers for different target pathogens on-demand. Adversarial learning was also used to augment this real image dataset by generating 16,000 realistic synthetic microchip images, through style generative adversarial networks (StyleGAN). We used this platform, termed s martphone-based p athogen de tection r esource m ultiplier using a dversarial n etworks (SPyDERMAN), to accurately detect different intact viruses in clinical samples and to detect viral nucleic acids through integration with CRISPR diagnostics. We evaluated the performance of the system in detecting five different virus targets using 179 patient samples. The generalizability of the system was confirmed by rapid reconfiguration to detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens in nasal swab samples ( n = 62) with 100% accuracy. Overall, the SPyDERMAN system may contribute to epidemic preparedness strategies by providing a platform for smartphone-based diagnostics that can be adapted to a given emerging viral agent within days of work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.0c06807

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The deployment of lightweight AI models on edge devices revolutionizes medical AI by enabling real-time, localized data processing with minimal latency.

    “The deployment of lightweight AI models on edge devices revolutionizes medical AI by enabling real-time, localized data processing with minimal latency.132,133”

    From A foundational architecture for AI agents in healthcare (2025) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Abstract (page not supplied) describes mobile-device image processing as promising for smartphone-based infectious-disease diagnostics, and Results and Discussion calls for accurate on-phone image processing. The paper does not establish that lightweight AI models were deployed on edge devices, that processing had minimal latency, or that this approach revolutionizes medical AI generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Mirza M; Osindero S Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets. arXiv:1411.178v1 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shokr, A., Pacheco, L. G. C., Thirumalaraju, P., Kanakasabapathy, M. K., Gandhi, J., Kartik, D., Silva, F. S. R., Erdogmus, E., Kandula, H., Luo, S., Yu, X. G., Chung, R. T., Li, J. Z., Kuritzkes, D. R., & Shafiee, H.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Shafiee, Hadi
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2020-11-23
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
665-673
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W3108939174
Cited by
45
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI118502, R01AI138800, R61AI140489)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico
  • Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
smartphone-based diagnostics, virus detection, synthetic image generation, adversarial neural networks, CRISPR-based diagnostics, SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection, emerging viruses, epidemic preparedness
MeSH terms
Point-of-Care Testing, Smartphone, Deep Learning, COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Antigens, Viral, Communicable Disease Control, Disaster Planning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Platinum, Public Health, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Telemedicine, Metal Nanoparticles, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review