The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metformin-Mediated Fast Charge-Reversal Nanohybrid for Deep Penetration Piezocatalysis-Augmented Chemodynamic Immunotherapy of Cancer
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy still suffers from insufficient immune response and adverse effect of ICB antibodies. Chemodynamic therapy (CDT) has been demonstrated to be an effective way to synergize with ICB therapy. However, a low generation rate of reactive oxygen species and poor tumor penetration of CDT platforms still decline the immune effects. Herein, a charge-reversal nanohybrid Met@BF containing both Fe 3 O 4 and BaTiO 3 nanoparticles in the core and Metformin (Met) on the surface was fabricated for tumor microenvironment (TME)- and ultrasound (US)-activated piezocatalysis-chemodynamic immunotherapy of cancer. Interestingly, Met@BF had a negative charge in blood circulation, which was rapidly changed into positive when exposed to acidic TME attributed to quaternization of tertiary amine in Met, facilitating deep tumor penetration. Subsequently, with US irradiation, Met@BF produced H 2 O 2 based on piezocatalysis of BaTiO 3 , which greatly enhanced the Fenton reaction of Fe 3 O 4 , thus boosting robust antitumor immune response. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was inhibited by the local released Met to further augment the antitumor immune effect, achieving effective inhibitions for both primary and metastatic tumors. Such a combination of piezocatalysis-enhanced chemodynamic therapy and Met-mediated deep tumor penetration and downregulation of PD-L1 provides a promising strategy to augment cancer immunotherapy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Acid-activated Met@BF nanohybrids change zeta potential from −16.6 mV to + 18.5 mV at pH 6.0, penetrate melanoma spheroids by about 60 µm from the periphery toward the avascular core, with ultrasound-driven BaTiO₃ piezocatalysis, produce near-complete control of primary and metastatic disease in vivo relative to free-drug control arms [27].”
From Overcoming tumor microenvironment barriers: transformable and bioinspired nanomedicine strategies for deep tumor penetration (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Acid-activated Met@BF nanohybrids change zeta potential from −16.6 mV to + 18.5 mV at pH 6.0, penetrate melanoma spheroids by about 60 µm from the periphery toward the avascular core, with ultrasound-driven BaTiO₃ piezocatalysis, produce near-complete control of primary and metastatic disease in vivo relative to free-drug control arms [27].”
From Overcoming tumor microenvironment barriers: transformable and bioinspired nanomedicine strategies for deep tumor penetration (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Acid-activated Met@BF nanohybrids change zeta potential from −16.6 mV to + 18.5 mV at pH 6.0, penetrate melanoma spheroids by about 60 µm from the periphery toward the avascular core, with ultrasound-driven BaTiO₃ piezocatalysis, produce near-complete control of primary and metastatic disease in vivo relative to free-drug control arms [27].”
From Overcoming tumor microenvironment barriers: transformable and bioinspired nanomedicine strategies for deep tumor penetration (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
Is autoimmunity the Achilles' heel of cancer immunotherapy?
June, C. H., Warshauer, J. T., & Bluestone, J. A. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4321 · Cited by 445
Functional Immune Cell‐Derived Exosomes Engineered for the Trilogy of Radiotherapy Sensitization
Ma, X., Yao, M., Gao, Y., Yue, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, T., Nie, G., Zhao, X., & Liang, X. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202106031 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- 10.1038/nature10673 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaa8172 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13045-018-0582-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41571-020-0413-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.abc3646 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.2c02490 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41551-018-0262-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms13193 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.2c06026 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrc2981 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-017-00424-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/adhm.202002171 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.202108263 · DOI
- 10.1002/advs.201902137 · DOI
- 10.7150/thno.58711 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215049 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.8b09387 · DOI
- 10.1002/smll.202103868 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.5b06175 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aax1346 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201906024 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchem.2633 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.202001976 · DOI
- 10.1002/bmm2.12006 · DOI
- 10.1002/smll.202300327 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.2c01968 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jctb.4981 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.3c00603 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.2c09948 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.202300964 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/smll.201903881 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.12.023 · DOI
- 10.1002/advs.202203788 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114042 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41401-020-0366-x · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.202007149 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.030 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-25416-7 · DOI
- 10.1039/C9CS00773C · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-30436-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.202106392 · DOI
- 10.1002/asia.201600452 · DOI
- 10.1038/184053a0 · DOI
- 10.7150/thno.45777 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.1c00616 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.1c08108 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.9b18676 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40820-020-00489-z · DOI
- 10.1002/advs.202003074 · DOI
- 10.1002/smll.201401437 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15015-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101510 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2006.339 · DOI
- 10.1002/1878-0261.12851 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.1c11485 · DOI
- 10.1002/advs.201802134 · DOI
- Kuo L. J., 2008, In Vivo, 22, 305
- 10.1038/onc.2016.104 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1417636112 · DOI
- 10.1039/C7NR05450E · DOI
- 10.1002/asia.201600452 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124024 · DOI
- 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12951-021-01221-8 · DOI
- 10.1088/1748-605X/abffb5 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02513 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41578-018-0038-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41563-018-0093-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sheng, J., Yuan, W., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Qi, Y., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, S. (2026) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-026-04028-7 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Tang, Q., Wu, R., Yang, S., Geng, Z., He, P., Li, X., Chen, Q., & Liang, X.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-02-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 6314-6332
- ISSN
- 1936-0851
- 1936-086X
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Peking University Third Hospital (BYSYZD2019018, jyzc2018-02, BYSY2015023)
- Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (JQ22024)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271443)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review