The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Next-Generation Lithium Metal Anode Engineering via Atomic Layer Deposition
Abstract
Lithium metal is considered to be the most promising anode for next-generation batteries due to its high energy density of 3840 mAh g(-1). However, the extreme reactivity of the Li surface can induce parasitic reactions with solvents, contamination, and shuttled active species in the electrolyte, reducing the performance of batteries employing Li metal anodes. One promising solution to this issue is application of thin chemical protection layers to the Li metal surface. Using a custom-made ultrahigh vacuum integrated deposition and characterization system, we demonstrate atomic layer deposition (ALD) of protection layers directly on Li metal with exquisite thickness control. We demonstrate as a proof-of-concept that a 14 nm thick ALD Al2O3 layer can protect the Li surface from corrosion due to atmosphere, sulfur, and electrolyte exposure. Using Li-S battery cells as a test system, we demonstrate an improved capacity retention using ALD-protected anodes over cells assembled with bare Li metal anodes for up to 100 cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capacity Fade Mechanisms and Side Reactions in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Arora, P., White, R. E., & Doyle, M. (1998) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1838857 · Cited by 1,408
Cited by
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Advancing Lithium Metal Batteries
Liu, B., Zhang, J.-G., & Xu, W. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.008 · Cited by 1,647
A facile surface chemistry route to a stabilized lithium metal anode
Liang, X., Pang, Q., Kochetkov, I. R., Sempere, M. S., Huang, H., Sun, X., & Nazar, L. F. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.119 · Cited by 1,083
Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
Self-citationElectrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozen, A. C., Lin, C.-F., Pearse, A. J., Schroeder, M. A., Han, X., Hu, L., Lee, S.-B., Rubloff, G. W., & Noked, M.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-05-21
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5884-5892
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2217159267
- Cited by
- 816
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
