The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Powered Electrical Stimulation for Enhancing Neural Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Graphene–Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Hybrid Microfibers
Abstract
Engineered conductive scaffolds toward neural regeneration should have the ability to regulate mesenchymal stems cell (MSC) differentiation into neural lineage through an electrical stimulation-assisted culture process. In this work, a self-powered electrical stimulation-assisted neural differentiation system for MSCs was realized by combining a high effective triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) to supply pulsed electric simulation signals and a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT)-reduced graphene oxide (rGO) hybrid microfiber (80 μm in diameter) as a scaffold. The conductive PEDOT endows the rGO-PEDOT hybrid microfiber with an enhanced electrical conductivity and maintains a good cytocompatibility. MSCs cultured on this highly conductive rGO-PEDOT hybrid microfiber possess enhanced proliferation ability and good neural differentiation tendency. Importantly, by inducing electric pulses generated by the TENG as the electrical stimulation signal, which are triggered by human walking steps, neural differentiation of MSCs is dramatically improved. This study illustrates the customizability of the rGO-PEDOT hybrid microfiber for neural tissue engineering scaffolding applications, underlines the potential of a self-powered TENG electrical stimulation system for accelerating MSC differentiation into neural cells without bio/chemical cues, and suggests the TENG's practical use as a wearable stimulation system to assist nerve regeneration for a walking person.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In Vivo Powering of Pacemaker by Breathing‐Driven Implanted Triboelectric Nanogenerator
Zheng, Q., Shi, B., Fan, F., Wang, X., Yan, L., Yuan, W., Wang, S., Liu, H., Li, Z., & Wang, Z. L. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201402064 · Cited by 603
Self-citationKim, D. ‐., Richardson‐Burns, S. M., Hendricks, J. L., Sequera, C., & Martin, D. C. (2007) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.200500594 · Cited by 299
Cited by
Magnetically Driven Micro and Nanorobots
Zhou, H., Mayorga-Martinez, C. C., Pané, S., Zhang, L., & Pumera, M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01234 · Cited by 889
Recent Progress on Piezoelectric and Triboelectric Energy Harvesters in Biomedical Systems
Zheng, Q., Shi, B., Li, Z., & Wang, Z. L. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201700029 · Cited by 566
Self-citationCheng, C., Li, S., Thomas, A., Kotov, N. A., & Haag, R. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00520 · Cited by 527
Liu, Z., Wan, X., Wang, Z. L., & Li, L. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202007429 · Cited by 478
Self-citationFully Bioabsorbable Natural‐Materials‐Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators
Jiang, W., Li, H., Liu, Z., Li, Z., Tian, J., Shi, B., Zou, Y., Ouyang, H., Zhao, C., Zhao, L., et al. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801895 · Cited by 449
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, W., Zhang, X., Yu, X., Wang, S., Qiu, J., Tang, W., Li, L., Liu, H., & Wang, Z. L.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-05-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5086-5095
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2347172382
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.