The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Size and Shape on the Anatomical Distribution of Endotoxin-Free Gold Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
The transport and the delivery of drugs through nanocarriers is a great challenge of pharmacology. Since the production of liposomes to reduce the toxicity of doxorubicin in patients, a plethora of nanomaterials have been produced and characterized. Although it is widely known that elementary properties of nanomaterials influence their in vivo kinetics, such interaction is often poorly investigated in many preclinical studies. The present study aims to evaluate the actual effect of size and shape on the biodistribution of a set of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) after intravenous administration in mice. To this goal, quantitative data achieved by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and observational results emerging from histochemistry (autometallography and enhanced dark-field hyperspectral microscopy) were combined. Since the immune system plays a role in bionano-interaction we used healthy immune-competent mice. To keep the immune surveillance on the physiological levels we synthesized endotoxin-free GNPs to be tested in specific pathogen-free animals. Our study mainly reveals that (a) the size and the shape greatly influence the kinetics of accumulation and excretion of GNPs in filter organs; (b) spherical and star-like GNPs showed the same percentage of accumulation, but a different localization in liver; (c) only star-like GNPs are able to accumulate in lung; (d) changes in the geometry did not improve the passage of the blood brain barrier. Overall, this study can be considered as a reliable starting point to drive the synthesis and the functionalization of potential candidates for theranostic purposes in many fields of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease
Horvath, P., Aulner, N., Bickle, M., Davies, A. M., Nery, E. D., Ebner, D., Montoya, M. C., Östling, P., Pietiäinen, V., Price, L. S., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.175 · Cited by 525
Modulating Pharmacokinetics, Tumor Uptake and Biodistribution by Engineered Nanoparticles
Arvizo, R. R., Miranda, O. R., Moyano, D. F., Walden, C. A., Giri, K., Bhattacharya, R., Robertson, J. D., Rotello, V. M., Reid, J. M., & Mukherjee, P. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024374 · Cited by 403
Balducci, C., Mancini, S., Minniti, S., La Vitola, P., Zotti, M., Sancini, G., Mauri, M., Cagnotto, A., Colombo, L., Fiordaliso, F., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0284-14.2014 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Cited by
Dependence of Nanoparticle Toxicity on Their Physical and Chemical Properties
Sukhanova, A., Bozrova, S., Sokolov, P., Berestovoy, M., Karaulov, A., & Nabiev, I. (2018) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-018-2457-x · Cited by 1,107
Minimum information reporting in bio–nano experimental literature
Faria, M., Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Kent, S. J., Parton, R. G., Kavallaris, M., Johnston, A. P. R., Gooding, J. J., Corrie, S. R., Boyd, B. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0246-4 · Cited by 710
Self-citationNanoparticle Characterization: What to Measure?
Modena, M. M., Rühle, B., Burg, T. P., & Wuttke, S. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901556 · Cited by 498
Size-Tunable Strategies for a Tumor Targeted Drug Delivery System
Yu, W., Liu, R., Zhou, Y., & Gao, H. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.9b01139 · Cited by 489
Engineering of inorganic nanoparticles as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents
Ni, D., Bu, W., Ehlerding, E. B., Cai, W., & Shi, J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00316a · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Talamini, L., Violatto, M. B., Cai, Q., Monopoli, M. P., Kantner, K., Krpetić, Ž., Perez-Potti, A., Cookman, J., Garry, D., Silveira, C. P., Boselli, L., Pelaz, B., Serchi, T., Cambier, S., Gutleb, A. C., Feliu, N., Yan, Y., Salmona, M., Parak, W. J., Dawson, K. A., & Bigini, P.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-05-30
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5519-5529
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2620300476
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.