Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supervised Learning and Mass Spectrometry Predicts the in Vivo Fate of Nanomaterials

Lazarovits, James, Sindhwani, Shrey, Tavares, Anthony J., Zhang, Yuwei, Song, Fayi, Audet, Julie, Krieger, Jonathan R., Syed, Abdullah Muhammad, Stordy, Benjamin, Chan, Warren C. W.·2019·ACS Nano

Abstract

The surface of nanoparticles changes immediately after intravenous injection because blood proteins adsorb on the surface. How this interface changes during circulation and its impact on nanoparticle distribution within the body is not understood. Here, we developed a workflow to show that the evolution of proteins on nanoparticle surfaces predicts the biological fate of nanoparticles in vivo . This workflow involves extracting nanoparticles at multiple time points from circulation, isolating the proteins off the surface and performing proteomic mass spectrometry. The mass spectrometry protein library served as inputs, while blood clearance and organ accumulation were used as outputs to train a supervised deep neural network that predicts nanoparticle biological fate. In a double-blinded study, we tested the network by predicting nanoparticle spleen and liver accumulation with upward of 94% accuracy. Our neural network discovered that the mechanism of liver and spleen uptake is due to patterns of a multitude of nanoparticle surface adsorbed proteins. There are too many combinations to change these proteins manually using chemical or biological inhibitors to alter clearance. Therefore, we developed a technique that uses the host to act as a bioreactor to prepare nanoparticles with predictable clearance patterns that reduce liver and spleen uptake by 50% and 70%, respectively. These techniques provide opportunities to both predict nanoparticle behavior and also to engineer surface chemistries that are specifically designed by the body.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.9b02774

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Lazarovits, J., Sindhwani, S., Tavares, A. J., Zhang, Y., Song, F., Audet, J., Krieger, J. R., Syed, A. M., Stordy, B., & Chan, W. C. W.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2019-06-21
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
8023-8034
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2953089157
Cited by
196
References
10
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supervised Learning and Mass Spectrometry Predicts the in Vivo Fate of Nanomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.9b02774
The paper
Lazarovits, J., Sindhwani, S., Tavares, A. J., Zhang, Y., Song, F., Audet, J., Krieger, J. R., Syed, A. M., Stordy, B., & Chan, W. C. W. (2019). Supervised Learning and Mass Spectrometry Predicts the in Vivo Fate of Nanomaterials. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b02774

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.