The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soft Three-Dimensional Robots with Hard Two-Dimensional Materials
Abstract
Inspired by biological organisms, soft engineered robots seek to augment the capabilities of rigid robots by providing safe, compliant, and flexible interfaces for human-machine interactions. Soft robots provide significant advantages in applications ranging from pick-and-place, prostheses, wearables, and surgical and drug-delivery devices. Conventional soft robots are typically composed of elastomers or gels, where changes in material properties such as stiffness or swelling control actuation. However, soft materials have limited electronic and optical performance, mechanical rigidity, and stability against environmental damage. Atomically thin two-dimensional layered materials (2DLMs) such as graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides have excellent electrical, optical, mechanical, and barrier properties and have been used to create ultrathin interconnects, transistors, photovoltaics, photocatalysts, and biosensors. Importantly, although 2DLMs have high in-plane stiffness and rigidity, they have high out-of-plane flexibility and are soft from that point of view. In this Perspective, we discuss the use of 2DLMs either in their continuous monolayer state or as composites with elastomers and hydrogels to create soft three-dimensional (3D) robots, with a focus on origami-inspired approaches. We classify the field, outline major methods, and highlight challenges toward seamless integration of hybrid materials to create multifunctional robots with the characteristics of soft d…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even with new materials and hybrid designs (Xu and Gracias, 2019; Yirmibeşoğlu et al., 2019), maintaining full functionality without heavy protective measures remains difficult.”
From Wetware network-based AI: a chemical approach to embodied cognition for robotics and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Xu and Gracias, 2019
Citations
Cites
Design, fabrication and control of soft robots
Rus, D., & Tolley, M. T. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14543 · Cited by 5,825
Piezoelectricity of single-atomic-layer MoS2 for energy conversion and piezotronics
Wu, W., Wang, L., Li, Y., Zhang, F., Lin, L., Niu, S., Chenet, D., Zhang, X., Hao, Y., Heinz, T. F., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13792 · Cited by 2,287
Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics
Kim, S., Laschi, C., & Trimmer, B. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002 · Cited by 2,092
Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., & Cianchetti, M. (2016) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aah3690 · Cited by 1,570
Whitesides, G. M. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201800907 · Cited by 850
Graphene-based smart materials
Yu, X., Cheng, H., Zhang, M., Zhao, Y., Qu, L., & Shi, G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.46 · Cited by 796
Research works printed but not linked: 85
- 10.1038/nature19100 · DOI
- 10.1109/MRA.2016.2582718 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.018 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-25836-4 · DOI
- 10.1590/S0100-736X2016000500014 · DOI
- 10.1109/MPUL.2018.2814240 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41928-018-0024-1 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aab0129 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11458 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aac9439 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2008.67 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2010.279 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2010.172 · DOI
- 10.1021/nn501723y · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2014.207 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nnano.2013.100 · DOI
- 10.1002/aenm.201300574 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eml.2017.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-020901 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1157996 · DOI
- 10.1021/nl303168w · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14588 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1245711 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1217654 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04969 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/nl802558y · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201204576 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03461 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1003250107 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2008.96 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2015.282 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2016.15 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201405046 · DOI
- 10.1002/mame.201600553 · DOI
- 10.1557/mrs.2012.184 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00468 · DOI
- 10.1021/ar300203n · DOI
- 10.1021/nl103618e · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4921530 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05412 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04279 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1701084 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1712889115 · DOI
- 10.1021/am508970k · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.5b08609 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.025 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmat4327 · DOI
- 10.1002/advs.201600437 · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.201402070 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep27366 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02127 · DOI
- 10.1021/nl401088b · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.7b17907 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsanm.8b00022 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03953 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1261019 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201503680 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.8b11440 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.7b01710 · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.201704568 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-21871-3 · DOI
- 10.1039/C8TB01222A · DOI
- 10.1039/C8TB01285G · DOI
- 10.1021/nn3006812 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1500533 · DOI
- 10.1002/admt.201800366 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201806386 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.5020918 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201502777 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201304358 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep09503 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.6b04769 · DOI
- 10.1002/smll.200901877 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.8b22099 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature23668 · DOI
- 10.1039/C6NR07265H · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.7b10348 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.9b00144 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201606425 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4959898 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1616377114 · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.201706277 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aav7304 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Damiano, L., Fleres, A., Roli, A., & Stano, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1694338 · Cited by 2
“Even with new materials and hybrid designs (Xu and Gracias, 2019; Yirmibeşoğlu et al., 2019), maintaining full functionality without heavy protective measures remains difficult.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, W., & Gracias, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gracias, David H.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-05-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 4883-4892
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2944800629
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1830893, 1635443)
- U.S. Department of Defense (FA9550-16-1-0031)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
- Keywords
- soft robots, two-dimensional layered materials, graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides, hybrid materials, rubber composites, composite hydrogels, origami-inspired robotics, human-machine interaction, flexible electronics, multifunctional robot
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review