CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of Efficient Magnetic Particles and Activated Carbon for Dye Removal from Wastewater

Moosavi, Seyedehmaryam, Lai, Chin Wei, Gan, Sinyee, Zamiri, Golnoush, Akbarzadeh Pivehzhani, Omid, Johan, Mohd Rafie·2020·ACS Omega
DOI 10.1021/acsomega.0c01905PMC PMC7450512
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the turn of the 21st century, water pollution has been a major issue, and most of the pollution is generated by dyes. Adsorption is one of the most commonly used dye-removal methods from aqueous solution. Magnetic-particle integration in the water-treatment industry is gaining considerable attention because of its outstanding physical and chemical properties. Magnetic-particle adsorption technology shows promising and effective outcomes for wastewater treatment owing to the presence of magnetic material in the adsorbents that can facilitate separation through the application of an external magnetic field. Meanwhile, the introduction of activated carbon (AC) derived from various materials into a magnetic material can lead to efficient organic-dye removal. Therefore, this combination can provide an economical, efficient, and environmentally friendly water-purification process. Although activated carbon from low-cost and abundant materials has considerable potential in the water-treatment industry, the widespread applications of adsorption technology are limited by adsorbent recovery and separation after treatment. This work specifically and comprehensively describes the use of a combination of a magnetic material and an activated carbon material for dye adsorption in wastewater treatment. The literature survey in this mini-review provides evidence of the potential use of these magnetic adsorbents, as well as their magnetic separation and recovery. Future directions and challenges of magnetic activated carbon in wastewater treatment are also discussed in this paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.0c01905

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major drawbacks of AOPs for dye removal include sludge production in Fenton reagent, formation of toxic byproduct in photocatalyst, and high cost due to expensive reagents and energy consumption.

    “Sludge production in the case of Fenton reagent, formation of toxic byproduct in the case of photocatalyst, and high cost due to the use of expensive reagents (for example, H 2 O 2 ) and energy consumption (generation of O 3 or UV radiation) are the major drawback of AOPs for dye removal (Cuerda-Correa et al., 2020;Moosavi et al., 2020).”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Moosavi et al., 2020

    Table 1 in the Introduction identifies sludge production as a disadvantage of Fenton reagents, toxic byproduct formation for photocatalysts, and high operational cost for ozonation. It does not attribute AOP costs to H₂O₂, ozone generation, or UV radiation; it instead lists low-cost reagents for Fenton treatment and low operational cost for photocatalysis. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • A large pore volume allows binding of the highest number of dye molecules to the adsorbent.

    “The presence of a large pore volume allows the binding of the highest number of dye molecules to the adsorbent (Hassan and Carr, 2021;Moosavi et al., 2020).”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Moosavi et al., 2020

  • Recovery of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient, making them unsuitable for industrial applications, and reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products.

    “Some authors stated that the recovery step of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient so that they are not suitable for industrial applications (Moosavi et al., 2020), and more particularly reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products (Saha et al., 2020).”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Moosavi et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Li, 2017, Preparation and characterization of super activated carbon produced from gulfweed by KOH activation, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 243, 291, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.052 · DOI
  2. Liu, 2017, Role of the functional groups in the adsorption of bisphenol A onto activated carbon: thermal modification and mechanism, Aqua, 66, 105, 10.2166/aqua.2017.047 · DOI
  3. Moosavi, 2019, Functionalized cellulose beads with activated carbon Fe3O4 /CoFe2O4 for cationic dye removal, Cellul. Chem. Technol., 53, 815, 10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.80 · DOI
  4. Shende, 2002, Wet oxidative regeneration of activated carbon loaded with reactive dye, Waste Manage., 22, 73, 10.1016/S0956-053X(01)00022-8 · DOI
  5. Wang, 2019, Facile synthesis of shell-core structured Fe3O4 @ACS as recyclable magnetic adsorbent for methylene blue removal, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 40, 1736, 10.1080/01932691.2018.1535981 · DOI
  6. Li, 2011, Preparation and utilization of sludge-based activated carbon for the adsorption of dyes from aqueous solutions, Chem. Eng. J., 171, 320, 10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.012 · DOI
  7. Lu, 2011, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers Chemical regeneration of activated carbon used for dye adsorption, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 42, 305, 10.1016/j.jtice.2010.06.001 · DOI
  8. Oliveira, 2002, Activated carbon/ iron oxide magnetic composites for the adsorption of contaminants in water, Carbon, 40, 2177, 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00076-3 · DOI
  9. Ranjithkumar, 2014, Synthesis of magnetic activated carbon/α-Fe2O3 nanocomposite and its application in the removal of acid yellow 17 dye from water, J. Hazard. Mater., 273, 127, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.034 · DOI
  10. Ghaedi, 2014, Least square-support vector (LS-SVM) method for modeling of methylene blue dye adsorption using copper oxide loaded on activated carbon: Kinetic and isotherm study, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20, 1641, 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.08.011 · DOI
  11. Reza, 2015, A novel synthesis of Fe2O3@activated carbon composite and its exploitation for the elimination of carcinogenic textile dye from an aqueous phase, RSC Adv., 5, 10575, 10.1039/C4RA13601B · DOI
  12. Bagheri, 2017, Comparative study on ultrasonic assisted adsorption of dyes from single system onto Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: Experimental design methodology, Ultrason. Sonochem., 34, 294, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.05.047 · DOI
  13. Altıntıg, 2017, Effective removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions using magnetic loaded activated carbon as novel adsorbent, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 122, 151, 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.03.035 · DOI
  14. Saleh, 2017, Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic evaluation of amine functionalized magnetic carbon for methyl red removal from aqueous solutions, J. Mol. Liq., 248, 577, 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.10.064 · DOI
  15. Juang, 2018, Synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4 /activated carbon nanocomposites with high surface area as recoverable adsorbents, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 90, 51, 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.12.005 · DOI
  16. Muntean, 2018, Removal of Colored Organic Pollutants from Wastewaters by Magnetite/Carbon Nanocomposites: Single and Binary Systems, J. Chem., 2018, 1, 10.1155/2018/6249821 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Feiqiang, 2018, Characteristics and toxic dye adsorption of magnetic activated carbon prepared from biomass waste by modified one-step synthesis, Colloids Surf., A, 555, 43, 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.06.061 · DOI
  18. Tuzen, 2018, Response surface optimization, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for effective removal of rhodamine B by magnetic AC/CeO2 nanocomposite, J. Environ. Manage., 206, 170, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.016 · DOI
  19. Abdel-Ghani, 2019, Magnetic activated carbon nanocomposite from Nigella sativa L. waste (MNSA) for the removal of Coomassie brilliant blue dye from aqueous solution: Statistical design of experiments for optimization of the adsorption conditions, J. Adv. Res., 17, 55, 10.1016/j.jare.2018.12.004 · DOI
  20. Moosavi, 2017, Hydrothermal synthesis, magnetic properties and characterization of CoFe2O4 nanocrystals, Ceram. Int., 43, 7889, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.110 · DOI
  21. Jiang, 2019, Adsorption of cationic dye from water using an iron oxide/activated carbon magnetic composites prepared from sugarcane bagasse by microwave method, Environ. Technol., 1, 10.1080/09593330.2019.1627425 · DOI
  22. Liu, 2019, Enhanced dyes adsorption from wastewater via Fe3O4 nanoparticles functionalized activated carbon, J. Hazard. Mater., 373, 397, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.103 · DOI
  23. Do, 2011, Activated carbon/Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite: fabrication, methyl orange removal and regeneration by hydrogen peroxide, Chemosphere, 85, 1269, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.023 · DOI
  24. Zhang, 2007, CuFe2O4/activated carbon composite : A novel magnetic adsorbent for the removal of acid orange II and catalytic regeneration, Chemosphere, 68, 1058, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.081 · DOI
  25. Zhang, 2018, Magnetic Activated Carbon for Efficient Removal of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solution, Environ. Eng. Sci., 35, 111, 10.1089/ees.2016.0632 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moosavi, S., Lai, C. W., Gan, S., Zamiri, G., Akbarzadeh Pivehzhani, O., & Johan, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University for Malaya (UM) , , Level 3, Block A , ,
  • Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) , , , ,
  • University of Malaya , , ,
ORCID
Venue
ACS Omega
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2020-08-10
Volume
5
Issue
33
Pages
20684-20697
ISSN
2470-1343
DOI
10.1021/acsomega.0c01905
PMC
PMC7450512
Cited by
458
References
1
Language
en
Licence
pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html (vor)
Funders
Universiti Malaya (IIRG018A-2019, RP045B, RU001-2018, ST012-2019, TOP100NANOCAT)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review