Cited by 57Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisFood and Agricultural SciencesPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Phenolic and Volatile Compounds in the Production of Sugarcane Vinegar

Open access
Chen, Gan-Lin, Zheng, Feng-Jin, Lin, Bo, Lao, Shui-Bing, He, Jie, Huang, Zhi, Zeng, Yuan, Sun, Jian +1 more·2020·ACS Omega

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the dynamic variations in the phenolic and volatile organic compounds of sugarcane vinegar subjected to different production processes. The determination of phenolic and volatile organic compounds was performed by UPLC-MS and solid phase micro extraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The complete fermentation process of sugarcane lasted nine days, and production of vinegar of up to 3.04% (w/v), total acids, and 4.1° alcoholicity was accomplished. Various phenolic compounds of sugarcane juice (non-sterilized) and those of alcoholic and acetic acid fermentation were obtained after nine days of fermentation. These were benzoic acid (2.024, 1.002, and 1.027 mg L–1), ferulic acid (0.060, 0.205, and 1.124 mg L–1), quinic acid (0.019, 0.074, and 0.031 mg L–1), chlorogenic acid (0.349, 1.635, and 1.217 mg L–1), apigenin (0.002, 0.099, and 0.004 mg L–1), kaempferol (0.003, 0.336, and 0.003 mg L–1), caffeic acid (−, 0.005, and 0.005 mg L–1), luteolin (0.003, 0.323, and 0.005 mg L–1), and p-coumaric acid (0.018, 0.015, and 0.027 mg L–1). Forty-five volatile organic compounds were also identified. The sugarcane juice can be commercialized as an alternative to wine as it presents characteristics of an alcoholic fermented beverage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.0c04524

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Original sugarcane vinegar has the functions of lowering blood fat, improving anti-oxidative stress, reducing body weight, and enlarging organs.

    “It has been confirmed that original sugarcane vinegar has the functions of lowering blood fat, improving anti-oxidative stress, reducing body weight, and enlarging organs to developing diversified new products derived from available sugarcane raw vinegar (30, 32).”

    From Vinegar: A potential source of healthy and functional food with special reference to sugarcane vinegar (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes vinegar generally as an antioxidant that regulates lipid metabolism and promotes weight loss. It does not establish those effects specifically for original sugarcane vinegar or mention enlarging organs; the Results address its composition and flavor, not these health outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Acetic acid is the most abundant organic acid in vinegar.

    “As stated in Table 2, acetic acid is the most abundant acid in vinegar with a proportion of about 92.64–93.22% [29,55]”

    From Fruits Vinegar: Quality Characteristics, Phytochemistry, and Functionality (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that acetic acid accounts for 27.445% of measured volatile compounds in sugarcane vinegar, while all identified acids together account for 27.914%. This supports acetic acid being the predominant identified acid in that vinegar, but the paper does not support the citing sentence’s 92.64–93.22% figure or establish the proportion for vinegar generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The aroma components of original sugarcane vinegar were determined by GC-MS as 5 alcohols (5.19%), 9 esters (59.01%), 5 aldehydes (0.42%), 5 acids (27.92%), 4 ketones (0.43%), 1 phenol (0.01%), 3 hydrocarbons (0.09%), and 1 other heterocycle (0.69%).

    “The aroma components of original sugarcane vinegar were determined by GC-MS, such as 5 alcohols (5.19%), 9 esters (59.01%), 5 aldehydes (0.42%), and 5 acids (27.92%). Four types of ketones (0.43%), 1 type of phenol (0.01%), 3 types of hydrocarbons (0.09%), and 1 type of other heterocycle (0.69%)”

    From Vinegar: A potential source of healthy and functional food with special reference to sugarcane vinegar (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (page not provided) report GC–MS analysis of raw sugarcane vinegar and relative contents of 59.014% esters, 27.914% acids, and 5.185% alcohols, matching the claim after rounding. However, the Results explicitly identify six types of acids, not five, so the compound count is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Cejudo-Bastante M. J.; Rodríguez Dodero M. C.; Durán Guerrero E.; Castro Mejías R.; Natera Marín R.; García Barroso C. Development and optimisation by means of sensory analysis of new beverages based on different fruit juices and sherry wine vinegar. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 741– 748. 10.1002/jsfa.5785. 22806566 · DOI
  2. Cejudo-Bastante C.; Castro-Mejías R.; Natera-Marín R.; García-Barroso C.; Durán-Guerrero E. Chemical and sensory characteristics of orange based vinegar. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 3147– 3156. 10.1007/s13197-016-2288-7. 27784909 PMC5055879 · DOI
  3. Perestrelo R.; Silva C.; Silva P.; Câmara J. Establishment of the volatile signature of wine-based aromatic vinegars subjected to maceration. Molecules 2018, 23, 499 10.3390/molecules23020499. PMC6017499 29473913 · DOI
  4. Chen G.-L.; Zheng F.-J.; Sun J.; Li Z.-C.; Lin B.; Li Y.-R. Production and characteristics of high quality vinegar from sugarcane juice. Sugar Technol. 2015, 17, 89– 93. 10.1007/s12355-014-0352-z. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chinnici F.; Durán Guerrero E.; Sonni F.; Natali N.; Natera Marín R.; Riponi C. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) Characterization of Volatile Compounds in Quality Vinegars with Protected European Geographical Indication. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4784– 4792. 10.1021/jf804005w. 19385596 · DOI
  6. Yu Y.-J.; Lu Z.-M.; Yu N.-H.; Xu W.; Li G.-Q.; Shi J.-S.; Xu Z.-H. HS-SPME/GC-MS and chemometrics for volatile composition of Chinese traditional aromatic vinegar in the Zhenjiang region. J. Inst. Brew. 2012, 118, 133– 141. 10.1002/jib.20. · DOI
  7. Shu X.; Jiang X.-W.; Cheng B. C.-Y.; Ma S.-C.; Chen G.-Y.; Yu Z.-L. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis of the impact of processing on toxic components of Kansui Radix. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 73 10.1186/s12906-016-1039-7. PMC4765025 26912002 · DOI
  8. Marrufo-Curtido A.; Cejudo-Bastante M. J.; Rodríguez-Dodero M. C.; Natera-Marín R.; Castro-Mejías R.; García-Barroso C.; Durán-Guerrero E. Novel vinegar-derived product enriched with dietary fiber: Effect on polyphenolic profile, volatile composition and sensory analysis. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 7608– 7624. 10.1007/s13197-015-1908-y. 26604338 PMC4648899 · DOI
  9. Roberto R. M.; García N. P.; Hevia A. G.; Valles B. S. Application of purge and trap extraction and gas chromatography for determination of minor esters in cider. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1069, 245– 251. 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.02.019. 15830951 · DOI
  10. Ubeda C.; Callejón R. M.; Hidalgo C.; Torija M. J.; Mas A.; Troncoso A. M.; Morales M. L. Determination of major volatile compounds during the production of fruit vinegars by static headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 259– 268. 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.10.025. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jo D.; Kim G.-R.; Yeo S.-H.; Jeong Y.-J.; Noh B. S.; Kwon J.-H. Analysis of aroma compounds of commercial cider vinegars with different acidities using SPME/GC-MS, electronic nose, and sensory evaluation. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 22, 1559– 1565. 10.1007/s10068-013-0251-1. · DOI
  12. Ho C. W.; Lazim A. M.; Fazry S.; Zaki U. K. H. H.; Lim S. J. Varieties, production, composition and health benefits of vinegars: A review. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1621– 1630. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.128. 27979138 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Yu X.; Yang M.; Dong J.; Shen R. Comparative analysis of the antioxidant capacities and phenolic compounds of oat and buckwheat vinegars during production processes. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 844– 853. 10.1111/1750-3841.14074. 29509979 · DOI
  14. Kalpana K.; Lal P. R.; Kusuma D. L.; Khanna G. L. The effects of ingestion of sugarcane juice and commercial sports drinks on cycling performance of athletes in comparison to plain water. Asian J. Sports Med. 2013, 4, 181– 189. 10.5812/asjsm.34256. 24427476 PMC3880661 · DOI
  15. Oliveira É. R.; Caliari M.; Júnior M. S. S.; Oliveira A. R.; Duarte R. C. M.; Boas E. V. B. V. Assessment of chemical and sensory quality of sugarcane alcoholic fermented beverage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 72– 81. 10.1007/s13197-017-2792-4. 29358797 PMC5756184 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Nualsri C.; Reungsang A.; Plangklang P. Biochemical hydrogen and methane potential of sugarcane syrup using a two-stage anaerobic fermentation process. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 82, 88– 99. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.002. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kulkarni M. S.; Kininge P. T.; Ghasghase N. V.; Mathapati P. R.; Joshi S. S. Effect of additives on alcohol production and kinetic studies of S. cerevisiae for sugar cane wine production. Int. J. Adv. Biotechnol. Res. 2011, 2, 154– 158.
  18. Tzeng D.-I.; Chia Y.-C.; Tai C.-Y.; Ou A. S.-M. Investigation of Chemical Quality of Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinaruml.) Wine During Fermentation Bysaccharomyces Cerevisiae. J. Food Qual. 2010, 33, 248– 267. 10.1111/j.1745-4557.2010.00305.x. · DOI
  19. Le V.-D.; Zheng X.-W.; Chen J.-Y.; Han B.-Z. Characterization of volatile compounds inFen-Daqu- a traditional Chinese liquor fermentation starter. J. Inst. Brew. 2012, 118, 107– 113. 10.1002/jib.8. · DOI
  20. Feng Y.; Liu M.; Ouyang Y.; Zhao X.; Ju Y.; Fang Y. Comparative study of aromatic compounds in fruit wines from raspberry, strawberry, and mulberry in central Shaanxi area. Food Nutr. Res. 2015, 59, 29290 10.3402/fnr.v59.29290. 26617387 PMC4663194 · DOI
  21. Duan W.-P.; Zhu B.-Q.; Song R.-R.; Zhang B.; Lan Y.-B.; Zhu X.; Duan C.-Q.; Han S.-Y. Volatile composition and aromatic attributes of wine made with Vitisvinifera L.cv Cabernet Sauvignon grapes in the Xinjiang region of China: effect of different commercial yeasts. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 1423– 1441. 10.1080/10942912.2018.1479860. · DOI
  22. Rapp A. Volatile flavour of wine: Correlation between instrumental analysis and sensory perception. Nahrung 1998, 42, 351– 363. 10.1002/(sici)1521-3803(199812)42:06<351::aid-food351>3.3.co;2-u. 9881361 · DOI
  23. Rodríguez-Bencomo J. J.; Conde J. E.; Rodríguez-Delgado M. A.; Garcia-Montelongo F.; Perez-Trujillo J. P. Determination of esters in dry and sweet white wines by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 963, 213 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00551-4. 12187973 · DOI
  24. Salinas M. R.; Garijo J.; Pardo F.; Zalacain A.; Alonso G. L. Color, polyphenol, and aroma compounds in rose wines after prefermentative maceration and enzymatic treatments. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2003, 54, 195– 202.
  25. Li H. Wine Tasting; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006.
  26. Lorenzo C.; Pardo F.; Zalacain A.; Alonso G. L.; Rosario Salinas M. Complementary effect of cabernet sauvignon on monastrell wines. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, 54– 61. 10.1016/j.jfca.2007.06.003. · DOI
  27. Silva C. C. F.; Caliari M.; Junior M. S. S.; Marques R. C. D.; Beleia A. D. P.; Garcia M. C. Physicochemical and sensory properties of sugar cane candies with roasted peanut and extruded rice bran. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 4, 163– 169. 10.12691/jfnr-4-3-6. · DOI
  28. Oliveira É. R.; Caliari M.; Soares Júnior M. S.; Vilas Boas E. V. d. B. Bioactive composition and sensory evaluation of blended jambolan (Syzygium cumini) and sugarcane alcoholic fermented beverages. J. Inst. Brew. 2016, 122, 719– 728. 10.1002/jib.370. · DOI
  29. Hamerski F.; da Silva V. R.; Corazza M. L.; Ndiaye P. M.; de Aquino A. D. Assessment of variables effects on sugar cane juice clarification by carbonation process. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 422– 428. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02857.x. · DOI
  30. Wu L.; Birch R. G. Doubled sugar content in sugarcane plants modified to produce a sucrose isomer. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2007, 5, 109– 117. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00224.x. 17207261 · DOI
  31. Dellacassa E.; Trenchs O.; Fariña L.; Debernardis F.; Perez G.; Boido E.; Carrau F. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) wine production in Angola: Characterisation of volatile aroma compounds and yeast native flora. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 241, 161– 167. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.10.014. 27783969 · DOI
  32. Masson J.; Cardoso M. d. G.; Zacaroni L. M.; Anjos J. P. d.; Sackz A. A.; Machado A. M. d. R.; Nelson D. L. Determination of acrolein, ethanol, volatile acidity, and copper in different samples of sugarcane spirits. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 32, 568– 572. 10.1590/s0101-20612012005000075. · DOI
  33. Cabrita M. J.; Torres M.; Palma V.; Alves E.; Patão R.; Costa Freitas A. M. Impact of malolactic fermentation on low molecular weight phenolic compounds. Talanta 2008, 74, 1281– 1286. 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.08.045. 18371781 · DOI
  34. Naczk M.; Shahidi F. Phenolics in cereals, fruits and vegetables: occurrence, extraction and analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 1523– 1542. 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.04.002. 16753277 · DOI
  35. Tian R.-R.; Pan Q.-H.; Zhan J.-C.; Li J.-M.; Wan S.-B.; Zhang Q.-H.; Huang W.-D. Comparison of phenolic acids and flavan-3-ols during wine fermentation of grapes with different harvest times. Molecules 2009, 14, 827– 838. 10.3390/molecules14020827. 19255542 PMC6253884 · DOI
  36. Chen S.; Su J.; Liu C.; Zhang H. Y.; Heng Y. W.; Liu Y. B. Analysis of contents of total phenolic compounds and total flavones and DPPH radical scavenging activity during overmature vinegar production. Food Sci. 2009, 17, 038.
  37. Li Y.-l.; Hu J.-j.; Li H.-m.; Shan F.; Bian J.-s.; Sun Q.-y. Study on variations of main function ingredients in the Tartary buckwheat vinegar fermentation process with uncooked material. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2011, 12, 055.
  38. Wang A.; Zhang J.; Li Z. Correlation of volatile and nonvolatile components with the total antioxidant capacity of Tartary buckwheat vinegar: Influence of the thermal processing. Food Res. Int. 2012, 49, 65– 71. 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.07.020. · DOI
  39. Zhang M.; Pan Q.; Yan G.; Duan C. Using headspace solid phase micro-extraction for analysis of aromatic compounds during alcoholic fermentation of red wine. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 743– 749. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.008. · DOI
  40. Jewison T.; Knox C.; Neveu V.; Djoumbou Y.; Guo A. C.; Lee J.; Liu P.; Mandal R.; Krishnamurthy R.; Sinelnikov I.; Wilson M.; Wishart D. S. YMDB: the Yeast Metabolome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D815– D820. 10.1093/nar/gkr916. 22064855 PMC3245085 · DOI
  41. Chen G.-L.; Zheng F.-J.; Lin B.; Wang T.-S.; Li Y.-R. Preparation and characteristics of sugarcane low alcoholic drink by submerged alcoholic fermentation. Sugar Technol. 2013, 15, 412– 416. 10.1007/s12355-013-0248-3. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Peña-Neira A.; Hernández T.; García-Vallejo C.; Estrella I.; Suarez J. A. A survey of phenolic compounds in Spanish wines of different geographical origin. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2000, 210, 445– 448. 10.1007/s002170050579. · DOI
  43. Blanco P.; Mirás-Avalos J. M.; Pereira E.; Orriols I. Fermentative aroma compounds and sensory profiles of Godello and Albariño wines as influenced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2849– 2857. 10.1002/jsfa.6122. 23471858 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, G.-L., Zheng, F.-J., Lin, B., Lao, S.-B., He, J., Huang, Z., Zeng, Y., Sun, J., & Verma, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science (CN)
  • Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences , , , ,
Corresponding author
Chen, Gan-Lin
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2020-11-17
Volume
5
Issue
47
Pages
30587-30595
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102666762
Cited by
57
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Spark Plan Project (2015GA790013)
  • Nanning Science and Technology Program of Guangxi (20171120-1)
  • Xixiangtang Science and Technology program of Nanning (201720103)
  • Guangxi Key Technology R&D Program (GK-AB16380244)
  • Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GuiNongKe 2018YT28)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
phenolic compounds, volatile organic compounds, alcoholic fermentation, acetic acid fermentation, benzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, luteolin, kaempferol, p-coumaric acid, sugarcane juice, vinegar production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review