The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable Recycling and Regeneration of Cathode Scraps from Industrial Production of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Abstract
The burst demand of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for energy storage leads to an increasing production of LIBs. The huge amount of electrode scraps produced during the industrial production cannot be overlooked. A sustainable and simple method was developed to regenerate Li(Ni 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 )O 2 electrode scraps as new cathodes for LIBs. Three different separation processes, including direct calcination, solvent dissolution, and basic solution dissolution, were applied to obtain the active materials. Then, a heat treatment was used to regenerate the scraps. The effects of separation methods and heat treatment temperatures were systematically investigated. The results show that the scraps regenerated with solvent dissolution and heat treatment at 800 °C deliver the highest reversible discharge capacities of 150.2 mA h g –1 at 0.2C after 100 cycles with capacity retention of 95.1%, which is comparable with commercial Li(Ni 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 )O 2 cathodes. When cycled at 1C, a highly reversible discharge capacity of 128.1 mA h g –1 can be obtained after 200 cycles. By contrast, scraps regenerated through a direct calcination method at 600 °C exhibit the best cycling performances, with the highest capacity retention of 96.7% after 100 cycles at 0.2C and 90.5% after 200 cycles at 1C. By characterizations of XRD, SEM, XPS, and particle size distribution analysis, the improved electrochemical performances of regenerated cathodes can be attributed to the uniform particle morphology and newly formed protective LiF composite. The simple and green regeneration process provides a novel perspective of recycling scraps from industrial production of LIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunn, J. B., Gaines, L., Kelly, J. C., James, C., & Gallagher, K. G. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03029j · Cited by 561
Cited by
Commercialization of Lithium Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles
Zeng, X., Li, M., Abd El‐Hady, D., Alshitari, W., Al‐Bogami, A. S., Lu, J., & Amine, K. (2019) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201900161 · Cited by 1,542
A Critical Review and Analysis on the Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lv, W., Wang, Z., Cao, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2018) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03811 · Cited by 1,163
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationSodium‐Ion Batteries Paving the Way for Grid Energy Storage
Hirsh, H. S., Li, Y., Tan, D. H. S., Zhang, M., Zhao, E., & Meng, Y. S. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202001274 · Cited by 668
Tan, D. H. S., Banerjee, A., Chen, Z., & Meng, Y. S. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0657-x · Cited by 641
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Xue, Q., Li, L., Fan, E., Wu, F., & Chen, R.
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-10-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7041-7049
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2530060960
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable Recycling and Regeneration of Cathode Scraps from Industrial Production of Lithium-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01948
- The paper
- Zhang, X., Xue, Q., Li, L., Fan, E., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2016). Sustainable Recycling and Regeneration of Cathode Scraps from Industrial Production of Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.