The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moisture and Oxygen Barrier Properties of Cellulose Nanomaterial-Based Films
Abstract
Applications of cellulose nanomaterials (CNMs) have attracted increasing attention in recent years. One conceivable path lies in their commercial applications for packaging, in which their barrier properties will play an important role in determining their competiveness with conventional materials. This review critically analyzes the performance of CNMs acting as a barrier against moisture and oxygen permeation in CNM films, CNM-coated polymers and papers, and CNM-reinforced polymer composites, gives some insights into remaining challenges, and brings an overall perspective of compositing CNMs with other materials to achieve balanced properties adequate for barrier packaging. In general, CNMs are a poor moisture barrier but excellent oxygen barrier in the dry state and are still good below 65% relative humidity. The addition of CNMs can improve the oxygen barrier of the resulting polymer composites; however, neat CNM coatings and films can afford better oxygen barrier properties than dispersed CNMs in coatings and nanocomposites. The morphology and surface functionality of CNMs can be tailored to maximize the barrier performance of materials comprising them. The higher the surface charge density is of CNMs, the better is the barrier performance of coated polymers. Like other oxygen barriers such as ethylene vinyl alcohol and cellophane, the moisture sensitivity and sealability of CNMs can be improved by sandwiching them with high moisture-resistant and sealable polymers such as a polyolefin. A multilayered structure with layers of CNMs providing oxygen resistance covered by other layers of polymers providing moisture resistance and sealability might be competitive in barrier packaging markets dominated by synthetic plastics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700782 · Cited by 18,606
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Lavoine, N., Desloges, I., Dufresne, A., & Bras, J. (2012) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 · Cited by 1,791
Wood-Derived Materials for Green Electronics, Biological Devices, and Energy Applications
Zhu, H., Luo, W., Ciesielski, P. N., Fang, Z., Zhu, J. Y., Henriksson, G., Himmel, M. E., & Hu, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225 · Cited by 1,532
Visualization of Cellulose Synthase Demonstrates Functional Association with Microtubules
Paredez, A. R., Somerville, C. R., & Ehrhardt, D. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1126551 · Cited by 1,371
Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation
Fukuzumi, H., Saito, T., Iwata, T., Kumamoto, Y., & Isogai, A. (2009) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm801065u · Cited by 1,271
Modeling the Barrier Properties of Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites
Bharadwaj, R. K. (2001) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma010780b · Cited by 1,128
Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions
Fink, H.-P., Weigel, P., Purz, H. J., & Ganster, J. (2001) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00025-9 · Cited by 1,025
Bugnicourt, E., Cinelli, P., Lazzeri, A., & Alvarez, V. (2014) · Express Polymer Letters · doi:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2014.82 · Cited by 943
Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality
Park, H. (1995) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(00)88935-9 · Cited by 880
Cited by
Developing fibrillated cellulose as a sustainable technological material
Li, T., Chen, C., Brozena, A. H., Zhu, J. Y., Xu, L., Driemeier, C., Dai, J., Rojas, O. J., Isogai, A., Wågberg, L., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03167-7 · Cited by 1,674
Wu, F., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2021) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101395 · Cited by 909
Cellulose Nanopaper: Fabrication, Functionalization, and Applications
Liu, W., Liu, K., Du, H., Zheng, T., Zhang, N., Xu, T., Pang, B., Zhang, X., Si, C., & Zhang, K. (2022) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-022-00849-x · Cited by 435
Nanocellulose in food packaging: A review
Ahankari, S. S., Subhedar, A. R., Bhadauria, S. S., & Dufresne, A. (2021) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117479 · Cited by 371
Mujtaba, M., Lipponen, J., Ojanen, M., Puttonen, S., & Vaittinen, H. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158328 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Gardner, D. J., Stark, N. M., Bousfield, D. W., Tajvidi, M., & Cai, Z.
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-12-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-70
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2769088577
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moisture and Oxygen Barrier Properties of Cellulose Nanomaterial-Based Films. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523
- The paper
- Wang, J., Gardner, D. J., Stark, N. M., Bousfield, D. W., Tajvidi, M., & Cai, Z. (2018). Moisture and Oxygen Barrier Properties of Cellulose Nanomaterial-Based Films. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.