Cited by 54Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFuel Cells and Related Materials

Ru@Pt Core–Shell Nanoparticles: Impact of the Atomic Ordering of the Ru Metal Core on the Electrocatalytic Activity of the Pt Shell

Zou, Jiasui, Wu, Min, Ning, Shunlian, Huang, Lin, Kang, Xiongwu, Chen, Shaowei·2019·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

Constructing core–shell nanostructures is demonstrated to be an effective strategy to improve catalytic activity of metal nanoparticles. However, the impact of the atomic ordering of the metal core on the performance of the shell remains unexplored. Here, ruthenium–platinum (Ru–Pt) core–shell nanoparticles, with a crystalline and amorphous Ru core of the same diameter and diverse Pt shell thicknesses, are prepared and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), high-angle annular dark-field scanning transition electron spectroscopy (HAADF-STEM), and CO tripping voltammetry. The well-defined heterostructured Ru–Pt interface and anisotropic growth of the Pt shell on the crystalline Ru core ( [email protected] x ) were observed, while the amorphous Ru core induces a partial alloy at the Ru–Pt interface and isotropic growth of the Pt shell. The core–shell structure also results in an apparent down-shift of the d-band center of Pt, which dissipates much faster on the amorphous Ru core than on crystalline ones, as demonstrated by the XRD and CO desorption potential. The two sets of core–shell nanoparticles show that a volcano-shape dependence of the catalytic activity on the thickness of the Pt shell and the crystalline Ru core markedly enhanced the catalytic performance and stability toward electro-oxidation of formic acid and ethanol, which is ascribed to the lattice strain of the Pt shell, down-shift of the d-band center, the weakened CO ads…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01270

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zou, J., Wu, M., Ning, S., Huang, L., Kang, X., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Kang, Xiongwu
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2019-04-03
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
9007-9016
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2933608897
Cited by
54
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51602106)
  • Government of Guangdong Province (2016ZT06N569)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
lattice strain, CO poisoning, formic acid oxidation, ethanol electrooxidation, electrocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review