Cited by 13CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Genome Engineering by RNA-Guided Transposition for Anabaena sp. PCC 7120

Open access
Arévalo, Sergio, Pérez Rico, Daniel, Abarca, Dolores, Dijkhuizen, Laura W., Sarasa-Buisan, Cristina, Lindblad, Peter, Flores, Enrique, Nierzwicki-Bauer, Sandra +1 more·2024·ACS Synthetic Biology

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In genome engineering, the integration of incoming DNA has been dependent on enzymes produced by dividing cells, which has been a bottleneck toward increasing DNA insertion frequencies and accuracy. Recently, RNA-guided transposition with CRISPR-associated transposase (CAST) was reported as highly effective and specific in Escherichia coli . Here, we developed Golden Gate vectors to test CAST in filamentous cyanobacteria and to show that it is effective in Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. The comparatively large plasmids containing CAST and the engineered transposon were successfully transferred into Anabaena via conjugation using either suicide or replicative plasmids. Single guide (sg) RNA encoding the leading but not the reverse complement strand of the target were effective with the protospacer-associated motif (PAM) sequence included in the sgRNA. In four out of six cases analyzed over two distinct target loci, the insertion site was exactly 63 bases after the PAM. CAST on a replicating plasmid was toxic, which could be used to cure the plasmid. In all six cases analyzed, only the transposon cargo defined by the sequence ranging from left and right elements was inserted at the target loci; therefore, RNA-guided transposition resulted from cut and paste. No endogenous transposons were remobilized by exposure to CAST enzymes. This work is foundational for genome editing by RNA-guided transposition in filamentous cyanobacteria, whether in culture or in complex communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00583

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conjugation is particularly advantageous for transferring large plasmids or complex genetic constructs that are challenging to introduce via other transformation methods.

    “This approach is particularly advantageous for transferring large plasmids or complex genetic constructs that are challenging to introduce via other transformation methods [82].”

    From Cyanobacteria as a Photosynthetic Chassis for Metabolic Pathway Engineering with Heterologous Gene Expression (2026) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports that comparatively large plasmids containing CAST and an engineered transposon were successfully transferred into Anabaena by conjugation. The paper does not establish that conjugation is particularly advantageous over other transformation methods for constructs that those methods struggle to introduce. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arévalo, S., Pérez Rico, D., Abarca, D., Dijkhuizen, L. W., Sarasa-Buisan, C., Lindblad, P., Flores, E., Nierzwicki-Bauer, S., & Schluepmann, H.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Biology Department, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, CSIC and Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Americo Vespucio 49, Sevilla 41092, Spain
  • Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis (ES)
  • Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, New York 12180-3590, United States
Corresponding author
Schluepmann, Henriette
Venue
ACS Synthetic Biology
Published
2024-03-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
901-912
ISSN
2161-5063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392519069
Cited by
13
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Synthetic Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (9355)
  • Universiteit Utrecht
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO-ALWGS.2016.020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
CRISPR-associated transposases, CAST, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, filamentous cyanobacteria, genome editing, conjugation, suicide plasmid, single guide RNA, transposon insertion, plasmid curing, DNA integration
MeSH terms
RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cyanobacteria, DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Escherichia coli, Humans, Plasmids, RNA, Anabaena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review