The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insight into the Effect of Boron Doping on Sulfur/Carbon Cathode in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
To exploit the high energy density of lithium-sulfur batteries, porous carbon materials have been widely used as the host materials of the S cathode. Current studies about carbon hosts are more frequently focused on the design of carbon structures rather than modification of its properties. In this study, we use boron-doped porous carbon materials as the host material of the S cathode to get an insightful investigation of the effect of B dopant on the S/C cathode. Powder electronic conductivity shows that the B-doped carbon materials exhibit higher conductivity than the pure analogous porous carbon. Moreover, by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, we prove that doping with B leads to a positively polarized surface of carbon substrates and allows chemisorption of S and its polysulfides. Thus, the B-doped carbons can ensure a more stable S/C cathode with satisfactory conductivity, which is demonstrated by the electrochemical performance evaluation. The S/B-doped carbon cathode was found to deliver much higher initial capacity (1300 mA h g(-1) at 0.25 C), improved cyclic stability, and rate capability when compared with the cathode based on pure porous carbon. Electrochemical impedance spectra also indicate the low resistance of the S/B-doped C cathode and the chemisorption of polysulfide anions because of the presence of B. These features of B doping can play the positive role in the electrochemical performance of S cathodes and help to build better Li-S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries
Seh, Z. W., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., & Cui, Y. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00410a · Cited by 2,573
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Nanostructured Metal Oxides and Sulfides for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Liu, X., Huang, J., Zhang, Q., & Mai, L. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201601759 · Cited by 1,616
A sulfur host based on titanium monoxide@carbon hollow spheres for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries
Li, Z., Zhang, J., Guan, B., Wang, D., Liu, L.-M., & Lou, X. W. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13065 · Cited by 677
Self-citationEnhanced Electrochemical Kinetics on Conductive Polar Mediators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Zhang, G., Chen, X., Zhang, Z., Xu, W., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201605676 · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, C.-P., Yin, Y.-X., Ye, H., Jiang, K.-C., Zhang, J., & Guo, Y.-G.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-04-24
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 8789-8795
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2325009686
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.