The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mechanism of Methanol to Hydrocarbon Catalysis
Abstract
The process of converting methanol to hydrocarbons on the aluminosilicate zeolite HZSM-5 was originally developed as a route from natural gas to synthetic gasoline. Using other microporous catalysts that are selective for light olefins, methanol-to-olefin (MTO) catalysis may soon become central to the conversion of natural gas to polyolefins. The mechanism of methanol conversion proved to be an intellectually challenging problem; 25 years of fundamental study produced at least 20 distinct mechanisms, but most did not account for either the primary products or a kinetic induction period. Recent experimental and theoretical work has firmly established that methanol and dimethyl ether react on cyclic organic species contained in the cages or channels of the inorganic host. These organic reaction centers act as scaffolds for the assembly of light olefins so as to avoid the high high-energy intermediates required by all "direct" mechanisms. The rate of formation of the initial reaction centers, and hence the duration of the kinetic induction period, can be governed by impurity species. Secondary reactions of primary olefin products strongly reflect the topology and acid strength of the microporous catalyst. Reaction centers form continuously through some secondary pathways, and they age into polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, eventually deactivating the catalyst. It proves useful to consider each cage (or channel) with its included organic and inorganic species as a supramolecule that can react to form various species. This view allows us to identify structure-activity and structure selectivity relationships and to modify the catalyst with degrees of freedom that are more reminiscent of homogeneous catalysis than heterogeneous catalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cheng, K., Zhou, W., Kang, J., He, S., Shi, S., Zhang, Q., Pan, Y., Wen, W., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2017.05.007 · Cited by 533
Zhang, H., Cheng, Y.-T., Vispute, T. P., Xiao, R., & Huber, G. W. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01230d · Cited by 513
Recent advances of pore system construction in zeolite-catalyzed chemical industry processes
Shi, J., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Tang, Y., & Xie, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00626k · Cited by 363
Cheng, Y.-T., & Huber, G. W. (2011) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs200103j · Cited by 337
Ghorbanpour, A., Rimer, J. D., & Grabow, L. C. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b02367 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Haw, J. F., Song, W., Marcus, D. M., & Nicholas, J. B.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-27
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 317-326
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2141565159
- Cited by
- 955
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mechanism of Methanol to Hydrocarbon Catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar020006o
- The paper
- Haw, J. F., Song, W., Marcus, D. M., & Nicholas, J. B. (2003). The Mechanism of Methanol to Hydrocarbon Catalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar020006o
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.