Cited by 113Zeolite Catalysis and SynthesisCatalysts for Methane ReformingCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions

Computational Assessment of the Dominant Factors Governing the Mechanism of Methanol Dehydration over H-ZSM-5 with Heterogeneous Aluminum Distribution

Ghorbanpour, Arian, Rimer, Jeffrey D., Grabow, Lars C.·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

A van der Waals (vdW) corrected density functional theory (DFT) study of the methanol-to-DME reaction on H-ZSM-5 is conducted for both the associative and dissociative pathways. Calculations are performed for four different active site locations corresponding to Al sitings in sinusoidal and straight channels, and their intersections in the MFI zeolite framework. The Gibbs free energy landscape along the reaction paths computed for a typical set of conditions shows that the associative route is preferred, regardless of Al siting, but a transition in the mechanism from associative to dissociative is observed at higher temperatures. The crossover temperature, however, is not identical for the various active site locations, resulting in a temperature range over which both mechanisms are active. This observation may explain why methoxy, which is the key intermediate along the dissociative pathway, has been observed spectroscopically, whereas kinetic analysis points to dominant contributions of the associative pathway under similar conditions. Pore confinement effects largely contribute to transition state stabilization and have a significant impact on the reaction mechanism. The effect of acidity on kinetic performance is also tested by the substitution of three different heteroatom dopants (Al, Ga, In) at the active sites, but only a minor transition-state energy variation was observed. The fundamental information obtained in this study contributes to a better understanding of the complex interplay between pore confinement, acidity, and reaction conditions, and their effect on pathway selectivity. This knowledge can be utilized to either optimize DME production from methanol or facilitate the production of desired hydrocarbons in the methanol-to-hydrocarbon (MTH) process, which requires DME formation to initiate the conversion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.5b02367

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghorbanpour, A., Rimer, J. D., & Grabow, L. C.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Grabow, Lars C.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2016-03-03
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
2287-2298
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2274544186
Cited by
113
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0014468)
  • Office of Science (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET-1512224)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Keywords
methanol dehydration, HZSM-5, dimethyl ether synthesis, associative mechanism, dissociative mechanism, aluminum site distribution, MFI zeolite, pore confinement effect, transition state stabilization, zeolite acidity, methoxy intermediate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review