The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Substituent Effects in Noncovalent Interactions Involving Aromatic Rings
Open accessAbstract
Noncovalent interactions involving aromatic rings such as π-stacking, cation/π, and anion/π interactions are central to many areas of modern chemistry. Decades of experimental studies have provided key insights into the impact of substituents on these interactions, leading to the development of simple intuitive models. However, gas-phase computational studies have raised some doubts about the physical underpinnings of these widespread models. In this Account we review our recent efforts to unravel the origin of substituent effects in π-stacking and ion/π interactions through computational studies of model noncovalent dimers. First, however, we dispel the notion that so-called aromatic interactions depend on the aromaticity of the interacting rings by studying model π-stacked dimers in which the aromaticity of one of the monomers can be "switched off". Somewhat surprisingly, the results show that not only is aromaticity unnecessary for π-stacking interactions, but it actually hinders these interactions to some extent. Consequently, when thinking about π-stacking interactions, researchers should consider broader classes of planar molecules, not just aromatic systems. Conventional models maintain that substituent effects in π-stacking interactions result from changes in the aryl π-system. This view suggests that π-stacking interactions are maximized when one ring is substituted with electron-withdrawing groups and the other with electron donors. In contrast to these prevailing models, we have shown that substituent effects in π-stacking interactions can be described in terms of direct, local interactions between the substituents and the nearby vertex of the other arene. As a result, in polysubstituted π-stacked dimers the substituents operate independently unless they are in each other's local environment. This means that in π-stacked dimers in which one arene is substituted with electron donors and the other with electron acceptors the interactions will be enhanced only to the extent provided by each substituent on its own, unless the substituents on opposing rings are in close proximity. Overall, this local, direct interaction model predicts that substituent effects in π-stacking interactions will be additive and transferable and will also depend on the relative position of substituents on opposing rings. For cation/π and anion/π interactions, similar π-resonance-based models pervade the literature. Again, computational results indicate that substituent effects in model ion/π complexes can be described primarily in terms of direct interactions between the ion and the substituent. Changes in the aryl π-system do not significantly affect these interactions. We also present a simple electrostatic model that further demonstrates this effect and suggests that the dominant interaction for simple substituents is the interaction of the charged ion with the local dipole associated with the substituents. Finally, we discuss substituent effects in electrostatic potentials (ESPs), which are widely used in discussions of noncovalent interactions. In the past, widespread misconceptions have confused the relationship between changes in ESPs and local changes in the electron density. We have shown that computed ESP plots of diverse substituted arenes can be reproduced without altering the aryl π-density. This is because substituent-induced changes in the ESP above the center of aryl rings result primarily from through-space effects of substituents rather than through changes in the distribution of the π-electron density.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density functional theory with London dispersion corrections
Grimme, S. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.30 · Cited by 2,829
Cited by
Soft Materials by Design: Unconventional Polymer Networks Give Extreme Properties
Zhao, X., Chen, X., Yuk, H., Lin, S., Liu, X., & Parada, G. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01088 · Cited by 1,161
σ-Hole Bond vs π-Hole Bond: A Comparison Based on Halogen Bond
Wang, H., Wang, W., & Jin, W. J. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00527 · Cited by 631
Experimental Binding Energies in Supramolecular Complexes
Biedermann, F., & Schneider, H.-J. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00583 · Cited by 554
Applications of π-π stacking interactions in the design of drug-delivery systems
Zhuang, W.-R., Wang, Y., Cui, P.-F., Xing, L., Lee, J., Kim, D., Jiang, H.-L., & Oh, Y.-K. (2019) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.014 · Cited by 508
Recent advances in guest effects on spin-crossover behavior in Hofmann-type metal-organic frameworks
Ni, Z.-P., Liu, J.-L., Hoque, M. N., Liu, W., Li, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Tong, M.-L. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2016.12.002 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, S. E.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-22
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1029-1038
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2330263970
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Substituent Effects in Noncovalent Interactions Involving Aromatic Rings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar300109n
- The paper
- Wheeler, S. E. (2013). Understanding Substituent Effects in Noncovalent Interactions Involving Aromatic Rings. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300109n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.