The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different Strategies for Formation of PEGylated EGF-Conjugated PEI/DNA Complexes for Targeted Gene Delivery
Abstract
With the aim of generating gene delivery systems for tumor targeting, we have synthesized a conjugate consisting of polyethylenimine (PEI) covalently modified with epidermal growth factor (EGF) peptides. Transfection efficiency of the conjugate was evaluated and compared to native PEI in three tumor cell lines: KB epidermoid carcinoma cells, CMT-93 rectum carcinoma cells, and Renca-EGFR renal carcinoma cells. Depending on the tumor cell line, incorporation of EGF resulted in an up to 300-fold increased transfection efficiency. This ligand-mediated enhancement and competition with free EGF strongly suggested uptake of the complexes through the EGF receptor-mediated endocytosis pathway. Shielded particles being crucial for systemic gene delivery, we studied the effect of covalent surface modification of EGF-PEI/DNA complexes with a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) derivative. An alternative way for the formation of PEGylated EGF-containing complexes was also evaluated where EGF was projected away from PEI/DNA core complexes through a PEG linker. Both strategies led to shielded particles still able to efficiently transfect tumor cells in a receptor-dependent fashion. These PEGylated EGF-containing complexes were 10- to 100-fold more efficient than PEGylated complexes without EGF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ogris, M., Brunner, S., Schüller, S., Kircheis, R., & Wagner, E. (1999) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300900 · Cited by 1,178
Self-citation
Cited by
Polymeric nanomedicine for cancer therapy
Park, J. H., Lee, S., Kim, J.-H., Park, K., Kim, K., & Kwon, I. C. (2008) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.09.003 · Cited by 506
Non-viral gene delivery systems
Davis, M. E. (2002) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00294-x · Cited by 419
Polycation gene delivery systems: escape from endosomes to cytosol
Cho, Y. W., Kim, J.-D., & Park, K. (2003) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1211/002235703765951311 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Blessing, T., Kursa, M., Holzhauser, R., Kircheis, R., & Wagner, E.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-06-23
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 529-537
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W1978828567
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.