Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Site-Specific Antibody–Drug Conjugation through Glycoengineering

Zhou, Qun, Stefano, James E., Manning, Charlene, Kyazike, Josephine, Chen, Bo, Gianolio, Diego A., Park, Anna, Busch, Michelle, Bird, Julie, Zheng, Xiaoyang, Simonds-Mannes, Helene, Kim, Jennifer, Gregory, Rick C., Miller, Robert J., Brondyk, William H., Dhal, Pradeep K., Pan, Clark Q.·2014·Bioconjugate Chemistry

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been proven clinically to be more effective anti-cancer agents than native antibodies. However, the classical conjugation chemistries to prepare ADCs by targeting primary amines or hinge disulfides have a number of shortcomings including heterogeneous product profiles and linkage instability. We have developed a novel site-specific conjugation method by targeting the native glycosylation site on antibodies as an approach to address these limitations. The native glycans on Asn-297 of antibodies were enzymatically remodeled in vitro using galactosyl and sialyltransferases to introduce terminal sialic acids. Periodate oxidation of these sialic acids yielded aldehyde groups which were subsequently used to conjugate aminooxy functionalized cytotoxic agents via oxime ligation. The process has been successfully demonstrated with three antibodies including trastuzumab and two cytotoxic agents. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography and LC-MS analyses revealed the incorporation of ~1.6 cytotoxic agents per antibody molecule, approximating the number of sialic acid residues. These glyco-conjugated ADCs exhibited target-dependent antiproliferative activity toward antigen-positive tumor cells and significantly greater antitumor efficacy than naked antibody in a Her2-positive tumor xenograft model. These findings suggest that enzymatic remodeling combined with oxime ligation of the native glycans of antibodies offers an attractive approach to generate ADCs with well-defined product profiles. The site-specific conjugation approach presented here provides a viable alternative to other methods, which involve a need to either re-engineer the antibody sequence or develop a highly controlled chemical process to ensure reproducible drug loading.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bc400505q

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, Q., Stefano, J. E., Manning, C., Kyazike, J., Chen, B., Gianolio, D. A., Park, A., Busch, M., Bird, J., Zheng, X., Simonds-Mannes, H., Kim, J., Gregory, R. C., Miller, R. J., Brondyk, W. H., Dhal, P. K., & Pan, C. Q.
Venue
Bioconjugate Chemistry
Published
2014-02-28
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
510-520
ISSN
  • 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4812
OpenAlex
W4249056559
Cited by
223
References
2
FWCI
16.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Site-Specific Antibody–Drug Conjugation through Glycoengineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bc400505q
The paper
Zhou, Q., Stefano, J. E., Manning, C., Kyazike, J., Chen, B., Gianolio, D. A., Park, A., Busch, M., Bird, J., Zheng, X., Simonds-Mannes, H., Kim, J., Gregory, R. C., Miller, R. J., Brondyk, W. H., Dhal, P. K., & Pan, C. Q. (2014). Site-Specific Antibody–Drug Conjugation through Glycoengineering. Bioconjugate Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc400505q

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.