Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluorescent and Affinity-Based Tools To Detect Cysteine Sulfenic Acid Formation in Proteins

Open access
Poole, Leslie B., Klomsiri, Chananat, Knaggs, Sarah A., Furdui, Cristina M., Nelson, Kimberly J., Thomas, Michael J., Fetrow, Jacquelyn S., Daniel, Larry W., King, S. Bruce·2007·Bioconjugate Chemistry

Abstract

Cysteine sulfenic acid formation in proteins results from the oxidative modification of susceptible cysteine residues by hydrogen peroxide, alkyl hydroperoxides, and peroxynitrite. This species represents a biologically significant modification occurring during oxidant signaling or oxidative stress, and it can modulate protein function. Most methods to identify such oxidatively modified proteins rely on monitoring the loss of one or more thiol group(s) or on selective labeling of nascent thiol groups following reduction of oxidized proteins. Our previous work reported the direct labeling of these chemically distinct modifications with a dimedone analogue, 1,3-cyclohexadione, to which a linker and functional group (an alcohol) had been added; further addition of a fluorescent isatoic acid or methoxycoumarin reporter allowed detection of the incorporated tag by fluorescence techniques ( Poole, L. B., Zeng, B. B., Knaggs, S. A., Yakubu, M., and King, S. B. ( 2005) Synthesis of chemical probes to map sulfenic acid modifications on proteins. Bioconjugate Chem . 16, 1624-1628 ). We have now expanded our arsenal of tagging reagents to include two fluorescein-, two rhodamine-, and three biotin-conjugated probes based on the original approach. The new tools provide readily detectable fluorescent and affinity probes to identify sulfenic acid modifications in proteins and have been used in subsequent mass spectrometric analyses to confirm covalent attachment of the conjugates and directly determine the site of modification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bc700257a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Poole, L. B., Klomsiri, C., Knaggs, S. A., Furdui, C. M., Nelson, K. J., Thomas, M. J., Fetrow, J. S., Daniel, L. W., & King, S. B.
Venue
Bioconjugate Chemistry
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
2004-2017
ISSN
  • 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4812
OpenAlex
W2097341852
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluorescent and Affinity-Based Tools To Detect Cysteine Sulfenic Acid Formation in Proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bc700257a
The paper
Poole, L. B., Klomsiri, C., Knaggs, S. A., Furdui, C. M., Nelson, K. J., Thomas, M. J., Fetrow, J. S., Daniel, L. W., & King, S. B. (2007). Fluorescent and Affinity-Based Tools To Detect Cysteine Sulfenic Acid Formation in Proteins. Bioconjugate Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc700257a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.